The Role of Simpson Grading System in Spinal Meningioma Surgery: Institutional Case Series, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND

Although its validity has recently been questioned since its introduction, the Simpson grade has remained one of the most relevant factors in estimating the recurrence risk of intracranial meningiomas. This study aims to assess its role in spinal meningiomas through a retrospective analysis of a mono-institutional surgical series and literature meta-analysis.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature from 1980 to 2023, complemented by a mono-institutional series of 74 patients treated at "Santa Maria delle Grazie" hospital. Demographic, clinical, neuroradiological, pathological, surgical, and outcome data of case series were analyzed. For the meta-analysis, studies were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria, and a fixed-effects model was used to synthesize data due to assumed homogeneity among included studies. Statistical analyses included odds ratios (OR) for recurrence risk and assessment of publication bias using Peter's test.

RESULTS

Mono-institutional sample included 74 patients, most of whom were women (85%) with a median age of 61.9 years. The thoracic spine was the most common tumor location (81%). Recurrences occurred in patients with Simpson grade II and III resections. The meta-analysis involved 2142 patients from 25 studies and revealed a significantly higher recurrence rate for Simpson grades III-V compared to grades I-II (OR 0.10; CI95 0.06-0.16). Additionally, Simpson grade II had a higher recurrence risk than grade I (OR 0.42; CI95 0.20-0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

The Simpson grading remains a valid predictor of recurrence also for spinal meningiomas. Our findings revealed a significant increase in recurrence rate with higher Simpson grades. These results support the need to strive for Simpson grade I resection when feasible.