Gänsslen Axel, Pohlemann Tim, Lindahl Jan, Madsen Jan Erik
Department of Trauma Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
University Hospital, Johannes Wesling Hospital, Hans-Nolte-Straße 1, 32429, Minden, Germany.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Jan 11;145(1):125. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05699-3.
Patients with unstable hemodynamics and unstable pelvic ring injuries are still demanding patients regarding initial treatment and survival. Several concepts were reported during the last 30 years. Mechanical stabilization of the pelvis together with hemorrhage control offer the best treatment option in these patients. While pelvic ring stabilization using pelvic binders, external fixators and the pelvic C-clamp are the basis for mechanical stability of the pelvic ring, the optimal modality for pelvic bleeding control is still under discussion. Beside angioembolization (AE) and Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA), pelvic packing PP (predominantly extraperitoneal) with direct access to the pelvic bleeding sources, are potential options. The present overview represents the present status, results and the value of pelvic packing in treating these patients. Interpretation of these results must consider the difference between the initial European concept of pelvic ring stabilization followed by PP in contrast to the North American concept with a reduced rate of pelvic ring stabilizations.
血流动力学不稳定且骨盆环损伤不稳定的患者在初始治疗和生存方面仍然是具有挑战性的患者。在过去30年中报道了几种概念。骨盆的机械稳定与出血控制相结合为这些患者提供了最佳治疗选择。虽然使用骨盆固定带、外固定器和骨盆C形夹进行骨盆环稳定是骨盆环机械稳定的基础,但骨盆出血控制的最佳方式仍在讨论中。除了血管栓塞(AE)和主动脉复苏性血管内球囊闭塞(REBOA)外,能够直接触及骨盆出血源的骨盆填塞(PP,主要是腹膜外)也是潜在的选择。本综述介绍了骨盆填塞在治疗这些患者中的现状、结果和价值。对这些结果的解读必须考虑欧洲最初的骨盆环稳定后进行PP的概念与北美骨盆环稳定率降低的概念之间的差异。