Martínez-Quezada Daniel M, Rojas-Leal Alicia, Villaseñor José Luis, Terrazas Teresa
Área de Biología, Departamento de Preparatoria Agrícola, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Carretera México-Texcoco Km 38.8, 56230, Texcoco, Mexico State, Mexico.
Departamento de Botánica, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Apartado Postal, 70-233, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico.
Protoplasma. 2025 May;262(3):707-720. doi: 10.1007/s00709-024-02028-8. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
Secretory canals are distributed among seed plants, and their diversity is concentrated in many families of angiosperms, while other internal secretory structures such as secretory cavities have been identified only in Rutaceae, Myrtaceae, and Asteraceae. Identifying and recognizing these two types of secretory structures has been complicated, mainly due to their structural similarities. In this study, the ontogeny of canals and secretory cavities in two species of Asteraceae are described and compared, to understand the structural differences between them and allow the establishment of more appropriate homology hypotheses. Leaves of Bidens odorata and Tagetes tenuifolia in different stages of development, including the apex of the stems, were collected. The samples were processed using the methacrylate technique, and longitudinal and transverse sections were made. The development of both, canals and secretory cavities, is schizogenous, in contrast to what was previously reported for other families such as Rutaceae, where they are reported as lysigenous. In Asteraceae, canals originate from cells of the procambium while cavities originate from cells of the ground meristem. The structural and developmental similarities between both types of secretory structures allow us to infer that they have a close evolutionary origin. Canals and secretory cavities in Asteraceae can be differentiated based on the number of strata of secretory epithelium and sheath, the modifications of epidermal cells and mesophyll, and the type of promeristem that gives rise to them. Probably extravascular canals give rise to cavities in leaves of Asteraceae and probably in other plant families.
分泌道分布于种子植物中,其多样性集中在许多被子植物科中,而其他内部分泌结构如分泌腔仅在芸香科、桃金娘科和菊科中被发现。识别和区分这两种分泌结构一直很复杂,主要是因为它们在结构上有相似之处。在本研究中,描述并比较了菊科两种植物中分泌道和分泌腔的个体发育,以了解它们之间的结构差异,并建立更合适的同源性假说。采集了不同发育阶段的白花鬼针草和细叶万寿菊的叶片,包括茎尖。样品采用甲基丙烯酸酯技术处理,并制作纵切片和横切片。与之前报道的其他科如芸香科不同,芸香科的分泌结构被报道为溶生起源,而菊科中分泌道和分泌腔的发育均为裂生起源。在菊科中,分泌道起源于原形成层细胞,而分泌腔起源于基本分生组织细胞。这两种分泌结构在结构和发育上的相似性使我们推断它们有密切的进化起源。菊科中的分泌道和分泌腔可以根据分泌上皮和鞘的层数、表皮细胞和叶肉的变化以及产生它们的原分生组织类型来区分。可能维管束外分泌道在菊科植物的叶片以及可能在其他植物科的叶片中产生分泌腔。