Atlas Gabby, Hanna Chloe, Tan Tiong Yang, Tucker Elena, Ayers Katie, Sinclair Andrew, O'Connell Michele A
Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2025 May;102(5):539-546. doi: 10.1111/cen.15180. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
The ideal model of care for individuals with Differences of Sex Development (DSD) continues to evolve, with multiple models proposed. This study aimed to explore current care models for individuals with DSD in Australia and New Zealand (NZ) and to identify clinician perceptions of gaps and barriers in current practice.
Cross-sectional anonymous online questionnaire, conducted via Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) software. Clinicians involved in the diagnosis and management of individuals with DSD in Australia and NZ were contacted through multimodal recruitment approaches. Themes included demographics of respondents, preferred terminology, composition of the DSD multidisciplinary team (MDT) and availability of a database.
Seventy-nine eligible participants from centers in all states and territories of Australia and NZ commenced the survey with 63 complete responses. Almost One-third (31%) of participants are not currently part of a DSD MDT meeting at their center. While three quarters (76%) of respondents identified changes to DSD care over the past 5 years, three quarters (75%) also identified barriers to current care provision. Only 20% of respondents reported psychology being a current part of their MDT and 70% identified psychology as a desired but missing part of their team.
Responses to the survey identify gaps and barriers to DSD care across Australia and NZ, particularly a lack of psychosocial supports. Current models fall short of international recommendations and services need to explore the reasons for these gaps further.
性发育差异(DSD)个体的理想护理模式仍在不断演变,已有多种模式被提出。本研究旨在探讨澳大利亚和新西兰(NZ)DSD个体的当前护理模式,并确定临床医生对当前实践中差距和障碍的看法。
通过研究电子数据采集(REDCap)软件进行横断面匿名在线问卷调查。通过多模式招募方法联系了澳大利亚和新西兰参与DSD个体诊断和管理的临床医生。主题包括受访者的人口统计学、首选术语、DSD多学科团队(MDT)的组成以及数据库的可用性。
来自澳大利亚和新西兰所有州和领地中心的79名符合条件的参与者开始了调查,其中63份问卷完整作答。近三分之一(31%)的参与者目前未参加其所在中心的DSD MDT会议。虽然四分之三(76%)的受访者指出在过去5年中DSD护理发生了变化,但四分之三(75%)的受访者也指出了当前护理提供存在的障碍。只有20%的受访者表示心理学是其MDT目前的组成部分,70%的受访者认为心理学是其团队中期望但缺失的部分。
对该调查的回复揭示了澳大利亚和新西兰DSD护理存在的差距和障碍,尤其是缺乏心理社会支持。当前模式未达到国际建议,服务机构需要进一步探究这些差距产生的原因。