Xu Edison, Tabrizian Parissa, Gutierrez Julio, Hoteit Maarouf, Ghaziani Tara, Zhou Kali, Parikh Neehar, Ajmera Veeral, Aby Elizabeth, Shui Amy, Marino Rebecca, Martin Allison, Wong Christopher, Kao Karissa, Dave Shravan, Florman Sander, Yao Francis, Mehta Neil
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Hepatology. 2025 Jan 14. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000001231.
Patients with HCC meeting United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS)-downstaging (DS) criteria have excellent post-liver transplantation (LT) outcomes. Studies on HCC beyond UNOS-DS criteria ("All-Comers" [AC]) have been limited by small sample size and short follow-up time, prompting this analysis.
Three hundred twenty-six patients meeting UNOS-DS and 190 meeting AC criteria from 9 LT centers across 5 UNOS regions were enrolled from 2015 to 2023 and prospectively followed. Competing risk analysis and Kaplan-Meier method were used to evaluate DS and LT outcomes, and Fine-and-Gray and Cox models were used to identify predictors of outcomes. AC and UNOS-DS had similar median alpha-fetoprotein (15 vs. 12 ng/mL; p =0.08), MELD (9 vs. 9; p =0.52), and Child-Pugh (A vs. A; p =0.30). Two years after the first local regional therapy, 82% of UNOS-DS and 66% of AC were successfully downstaged ( p <0.001). In AC, DS rates were 72% for tumor number plus diameter of largest lesion <10, 51% for sum 10-12, and 39% for sum >12 ( p =0.01). Yttrium-90 achieved higher DS success than transarterial chemoembolization in AC (74% vs. 65%; p <0.001). 48% of UNOS-DS and 40% of AC underwent LT ( p =0.10). Five-year post-LT survival was similar between UNOS-DS and AC (74% vs. 72%; p =0.77), although 5-year post-LT recurrence was higher in AC (30% vs. 14%; p =0.02).
Despite higher HCC recurrence and lower intention-to-treat survival in AC, post-LT survival was comparable between UNOS-DS and AC. Yttrium-90 attained higher DS success than transarterial chemoembolization in AC. LT after DS is feasible in AC, though defining an upper limit in tumor burden may be necessary.
符合器官共享联合网络(UNOS)降期(DS)标准的肝癌患者肝移植(LT)术后预后良好。关于超出UNOS-DS标准(“所有患者”[AC])的肝癌研究因样本量小和随访时间短而受到限制,因此进行了本分析。
2015年至2023年期间,从5个UNOS区域的9个LT中心招募了326例符合UNOS-DS标准的患者和190例符合AC标准的患者,并进行前瞻性随访。采用竞争风险分析和Kaplan-Meier方法评估DS和LT结局,采用Fine-and-Gray模型和Cox模型确定结局的预测因素。AC组和UNOS-DS组的甲胎蛋白中位数相似(15 vs. 12 ng/mL;p = 0.08),终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分相似(9 vs. 9;p = 0.52),Child-Pugh分级相似(A vs. A;p = 0.30)。首次局部区域治疗后两年,82%的UNOS-DS患者和66%的AC患者成功降期(p < 0.001)。在AC组中,肿瘤数量加最大病灶直径<10的患者降期率为72%,总和为10-12的患者降期率为51%,总和>12的患者降期率为39%(p = 0.01)。在AC组中,钇-90的降期成功率高于经动脉化疗栓塞术(74% vs. 65%;p < 0.001)。48%的UNOS-DS患者和40%的AC患者接受了LT(p = 0.10)。UNOS-DS组和AC组LT术后5年生存率相似(74% vs. 72%;p = 0.77),尽管AC组LT术后5年复发率更高(30% vs. 14%;p = 0.02)。
尽管AC组肝癌复发率较高,意向性治疗生存率较低,但UNOS-DS组和AC组LT术后生存率相当。在AC组中,钇-90实现的降期成功率高于经动脉化疗栓塞术。AC组在DS后进行LT是可行的,不过可能有必要确定肿瘤负荷的上限。