Suppr超能文献

“你认为自己接受了哪种治疗?”一项脊柱手法治疗的随机双盲可行性试验。

'Which treatment do you believe you received?' A randomised blinding feasibility trial of spinal manual therapy.

作者信息

Muñoz Laguna Javier, Kurmann Astrid, Hofstetter Léonie, Nyantakyi Emanuela, Braun Julia, Clack Lauren, Bang Heejung, Farshad Mazda, Foster Nadine E, Puhan Milo A, Hincapié Cesar A

机构信息

Musculoskeletal Epidemiology Research Group, University of Zurich and Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Chiropr Man Therap. 2025 Jan 14;33(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12998-024-00561-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blinding is essential for mitigating biases in trials of low back pain (LBP). Our main objectives were to assess the feasibility of blinding: (1) participants randomly allocated to active or placebo spinal manual therapy (SMT), and (2) outcome assessors. We also explored blinding by levels of SMT lifetime experience and recent LBP, and factors contributing to beliefs about the assigned intervention.

METHODS

A two-parallel-arm, single-centre, placebo-controlled, blinding feasibility trial. Adults were randomised to active SMT (n = 40) or placebo SMT (n = 41). Participants attended two study visits for their assigned intervention, on average seven days apart. The primary outcome was participant blinding (beliefs about assigned intervention) using the Bang blinding index (BI) at two study visits. The Bang BI is arm-specific, chance-corrected, and ranges from - 1 (all incorrect beliefs) to 1 (all correct beliefs), with 0 indicating equal proportions of correct and incorrect beliefs. Secondary outcomes included factors contributing to beliefs about the assigned intervention.

RESULTS

Of 85 adults screened, 81 participants were randomised (41 [51%] with SMT lifetime experience; 29 [39%] with recent LBP), and 80 (99%) completed follow-up. At study visit 1, 50% of participants in the active SMT arm (Bang BI: 0.50 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.26 to 0.74]) and 37% in the placebo SMT arm (0.37 [95% CI, 0.10 to 0.63]) had a correct belief about their assigned intervention, beyond chance. At study visit 2, BIs were 0.36 (0.08 to 0.64) and 0.29 (0.01 to 0.57) for participants in the active and placebo SMT arms, respectively. BIs among outcome assessors suggested adequate blinding at both study visits (active SMT: 0.08 [- 0.05 to 0.20] and 0.03 [- 0.11 to 0.16]; placebo SMT: - 0.12 [- 0.24 to 0.00] and - 0.07 [- 0.21 to 0.07]). BIs varied by participant levels of SMT lifetime experience and recent LBP. Participants and outcome assessors described different factors contributing to their beliefs.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate blinding of participants assigned to active SMT may not be feasible with the intervention protocol studied, whereas blinding of participants in the placebo SMT arm may be feasible. Blinding of outcome assessors seemed adequate. Further methodological work on blinding of SMT is needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05778396.

摘要

背景

在腰痛(LBP)试验中,设盲对于减轻偏倚至关重要。我们的主要目标是评估设盲的可行性:(1)随机分配到主动或安慰剂脊柱手法治疗(SMT)的参与者,以及(2)结果评估者。我们还按SMT终生经验水平和近期腰痛情况探讨了设盲情况,以及影响对分配干预措施信念的因素。

方法

一项双平行组、单中心、安慰剂对照的设盲可行性试验。成年人被随机分为主动SMT组(n = 40)或安慰剂SMT组(n = 41)。参与者平均相隔七天参加两次针对其分配干预措施的研究访视。主要结局是在两次研究访视时使用邦氏设盲指数(BI)评估参与者的设盲情况(对分配干预措施的信念)。邦氏BI是针对特定组别的、经机会校正的,范围从-1(所有错误信念)到1(所有正确信念),0表示正确和错误信念的比例相等。次要结局包括影响对分配干预措施信念的因素。

结果

在筛查的85名成年人中,81名参与者被随机分组(41名[51%]有SMT终生经验;29名[39%]近期有腰痛),80名(99%)完成随访。在研究访视1时,主动SMT组中50%的参与者(邦氏BI:0.50[95%置信区间(CI),0.26至0.74])和安慰剂SMT组中37%的参与者(0.37[95%CI,0.10至0.63])对其分配的干预措施有正确信念,超出了偶然概率。在研究访视2时,主动和安慰剂SMT组参与者的BI分别为0.36(0.08至0.64)和0.29(0.01至0.57)。结果评估者的BI表明在两次研究访视时设盲情况良好(主动SMT:0.08[-0.05至0.20]和0.03[-0.11至0.16];安慰剂SMT:-0.12[-0.24至0.00]和-0.07[-0.21至0.07])。BI因参与者的SMT终生经验水平和近期腰痛情况而异。参与者和结果评估者描述了影响其信念的不同因素。

结论

在所研究的干预方案下,对分配到主动SMT的参与者进行充分设盲可能不可行,而对安慰剂SMT组的参与者设盲可能可行。结果评估者的设盲似乎是充分的。需要进一步开展关于SMT设盲的方法学研究。

试验注册号

NCT05778396。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae9/11730787/c734327eb558/12998_2024_561_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验