Suppr超能文献

减少青少年心理健康污名化的干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析

Interventions to Reduce Mental Health Stigma in Young People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Crockett Marcelo A, Núñez Daniel, Martínez Pablo, Borghero Francesca, Campos Susana, Langer Álvaro I, Carrasco Jimena, Martínez Vania

机构信息

Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths (IMHAY), Santiago, Chile.

Associative Research Program, Research Center on Cognitive Sciences, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Talca, Talca, Chile.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2454730. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54730.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Mental health stigma is a considerable barrier to help-seeking among young people.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of interventions aimed at reducing mental health stigma in young people.

DATA SOURCES

Comprehensive searches were conducted in the CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, and PsycINFO databases from inception to February 27, 2024. Search terms included "stigma," "mental health," "mental disorders," "adolescents," "youth," and "randomized controlled trial."

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria encompassed RCTs involving interventions aimed at reducing mental health stigma among young people (aged 10-24 years). Studies had to report outcomes related to stigma or help-seeking behaviors. Exclusion criteria included grey literature and studies without results.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were extracted independently by 7 authors (M.A.C., D.N., F.B., S.C., Á.I.L., J.C., V.M.) using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Three-level multivariate meta-analyses were conducted to account for within-study correlations and to maximize data use. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) (Hedges g) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated. The data analysis was conducted from May 30 through July 4, 2024.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcomes included stigma-related knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and general stigma. Help-seeking outcomes were categorized into attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. Secondary outcomes included self-efficacy and empowerment.

RESULTS

A total of 97 studies were included in the systematic review, representing 43 852 young people (mean [IQR] age, 18.7 [15.8-21.3] years; mean [IQR] females, 59.2% [49.4%-72.0%]), and 74 studies were included in 3-level multivariate meta-analyses. Significant short-term effect sizes were found for stigma-related knowledge (SMD, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.43-0.89), attitudes (SMD, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.56), behaviors (SMD, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13-0.45), and general stigma (SMD, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.34) and for help-seeking attitudes (SMD, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.09-0.28) and intentions (SMD, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.07-0.21). Social contact interventions had a greater influence on stigma-related behaviors than did educational approaches.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that interventions to reduce mental health stigma among youth are beneficial in the short term. Further high-quality RCTs with long-term follow-up are needed to better understand and enhance these interventions' outcomes.

摘要

重要性

心理健康污名化是年轻人寻求帮助的一个重大障碍。

目的

系统评价和荟萃分析旨在减少年轻人心理健康污名化的干预措施的随机临床试验(RCT)。

数据来源

对CENTRAL、CINAHL、Embase、PubMed和PsycINFO数据库从创建至2024年2月27日进行全面检索。检索词包括“污名化”“心理健康”“精神障碍”“青少年”“青年”和“随机对照试验”。

研究选择

纳入标准包括涉及旨在减少年轻人(10 - 24岁)心理健康污名化的干预措施的RCT。研究必须报告与污名化或寻求帮助行为相关的结果。排除标准包括灰色文献和无结果的研究。

数据提取与合成

7位作者(M.A.C.、D.N.、F.B.、S.C.、Á.I.L.、J.C.、V.M.)按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南独立提取数据。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。进行三级多变量荟萃分析以考虑研究内相关性并最大限度地利用数据。计算标准化均值差(SMD)(Hedges g)和95%置信区间的比值比(OR)。数据分析于2024年5月30日至7月4日进行。

主要结局与测量指标

主要结局包括与污名化相关的知识、态度、行为和总体污名化。寻求帮助的结局分为态度、意图和行为。次要结局包括自我效能感和赋权。

结果

系统评价共纳入97项研究,涉及43852名年轻人(平均[四分位间距]年龄,18.7[15.8 - 21.3]岁;平均[四分位间距]女性,59.2%[49.4% - 72.0%]),74项研究纳入三级多变量荟萃分析。发现与污名化相关的知识(SMD,0.66;95%置信区间,0.43 - 0.89)、态度(SMD,0.38;95%置信区间,0.20 - 0.56)、行为(SMD,0.29;95%置信区间,0.13 - 0.45)和总体污名化(SMD,0.20;95%置信区间,0.06 - 0.34)以及寻求帮助的态度(SMD,0.18;95%置信区间,0.09 - 0.28)和意图(SMD,0.14;95%置信区间,0.07 - 0.21)有显著短期效应量。社交接触干预对与污名化相关行为的影响大于教育方法。

结论与意义

这些发现表明,减少青少年心理健康污名化的干预措施在短期内是有益的。需要进一步开展长期随访的高质量RCT,以更好地理解并改善这些干预措施的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5837/11736514/b096e4d3a416/jamanetwopen-e2454730-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验