Suppr超能文献

软组织肉瘤新辅助帕唑帕尼与放疗的PASART-1和PASART-2试验参与者的长期生存情况。

Long-term survival of participants in the PASART-1 and PASART-2 trials of neo-adjuvant pazopanib and radiotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma.

作者信息

Van Riet Bauke H G, Van Meekeren Milan, Fiocco Marta, Miah Aisha, De Pree Ilse, Wiltink Lisette M, Scholten Astrid, Heimans Lotte, Bovée Judith V M G, Gelderblom Hans, Steeghs Neeltje, Haas Rick L

机构信息

Department of Radiotherapy, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2025 Jan 15;64:69-77. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42333.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of adding pazopanib to neo-adjuvant radiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with high-risk non-metastatic soft tissue sarcoma of the trunk and extremities treated in the PASART-1 and PASART-2 trials, as well as to compare the PASART cohorts to a control cohort receiving standard treatment during the same time period from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (IKNL) to investigate if adding pazopanib improves Overall Survival (OS).

METHODS

Updated follow-up data on disease control, survival and long-term toxicities of the PASART-trials were extracted from electronic patient records. The effect of adding pazopanib to neo-adjuvant radiotherapy on OS was investigated by comparing the combined PASART cohorts to the IKNL cohort via direct comparison and exact matching analysis.

RESULTS

PASART-trials included 34 patients, IKNL cohort included 487 patients. After a median follow-up of 75.4 months (range: 30-131 months) the 1-year, 2-year and 5-year OS in the PASART-trials were 97% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91.5-100), 85.3% (95% CI: 74.2-98.1), 79.3% (95% CI: 66.8-94.2), respectively. Matching resulted in 23 PASART and 89 IKNL patients. Adding pazopanib did not significantly improve OS when compared to standard treatment (IKNL) in a direct comparison (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.30-1.13) or matched analysis (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.29-1.73). Long-term toxicities, mainly fibrosis (n = 6) and edema (n = 2), were observed in 11 PASART patients and comparable to historical controls.

INTERPRETATION

The addition of pazopanib had tolerable long-term toxicity but did not improve OS when compared to a control cohort receiving standard treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在PASART - 1和PASART - 2试验中接受治疗的高危非转移性躯干和四肢软组织肉瘤患者,在新辅助放疗后加用帕唑帕尼并随后进行手术的长期安全性和疗效,同时将PASART队列与荷兰癌症登记处(IKNL)同期接受标准治疗的对照队列进行比较,以研究加用帕唑帕尼是否能改善总生存期(OS)。

方法

从电子病历中提取PASART试验关于疾病控制、生存和长期毒性的更新随访数据。通过直接比较和精确匹配分析,将PASART联合队列与IKNL队列进行比较,研究在新辅助放疗中加用帕唑帕尼对OS的影响。

结果

PASART试验纳入34例患者,IKNL队列纳入487例患者。中位随访75.4个月(范围:30 - 131个月)后,PASART试验中的1年、2年和5年总生存率分别为97%(95%置信区间[CI]:91.5 - 100)、85.3%(95% CI:74.2 - 98.1)、79.3%(95% CI:66.8 - 94.2)。匹配后得到23例PASART患者和89例IKNL患者。在直接比较(风险比[HR]:0.58;95% CI:0.30 - 1.13)或匹配分析(HR:0.70;95% CI:0.29 - 1.73)中,与标准治疗(IKNL)相比,加用帕唑帕尼并未显著改善总生存期。在11例PASART患者中观察到长期毒性,主要为纤维化(n = 6)和水肿(n = 2),与历史对照相当。

解读

加用帕唑帕尼具有可耐受的长期毒性,但与接受标准治疗的对照队列相比,并未改善总生存期。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/803f/11758146/c8e9ccae8966/AO-64-42333-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验