Eikenboom Ellis L, van Leeuwen Lotte, Groenendijk Floris, Woolderink Jorien M, Van Altena Anne M, Van Leerdam Monique E, Spaander Manon C W, van Doorn Helena C, Wagner Anja
Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Dec 21;79:103006. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103006. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Female Lynch syndrome carriers have an increased risk of developing endometrial cancer. Regardless, research on endometrial carcinoma tumorigenesis is scarce and no uniform, evidence-based gynaecological management guidelines exist. We therefore described gynaecological surveillance and surgery outcomes in a nation-wide Lynch syndrome cohort.
For this retrospective cohort study, female Lynch syndrome carriers, prospectively registered in the Dutch Lynch syndrome database (StOET), were included up to February 28th 2022. Carriers were linked to the Dutch national pathology (PALGA) database. The number of carriers with/without gynaecological surveillance, number of index carriers with endometrial carcinoma before Lynch syndrome diagnosis were assessed, as well as uptake of risk-reducing surgery and characteristics of endometrial carcinomas including the requisite for adjuvant therapy according to current guidelines. Overall survival after endometrial carcinoma diagnosis was analyzed using Kaplan Meier time to event analyses, cumulative incidence was calculated after adjusting for competing risks (death and prophylactic hysterectomy).
In total, 1046 registered female Lynch syndrome carriers were eligible for surveillance, of whom 313 (30.0%) did not have surveillance and 21.4% (n = 224 of 1046) opted for prophylactic hysterectomy. In carriers with surveillance, more cases of endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia were found than in those without (37 endometrial carcinomas (7.3%) and 28 hyperplasias (5.5%) in 506 carriers with surveillance versus 14 (2.6%) and 4 (0.7%) in 540 carriers without surveillance, respectively); carriers with surveillance were generally younger than those without (median 56 years [IQR 48-65] versus median 65 years [IQR 49-75] at database assembly, respectively; p < 0.0001). Endometrial carcinomas were predominantly of endometrioid type and FIGO stage IA, regardless of surveillance. Adjuvant external beam radiotherapy was required in one patient in both groups. Overall survival after endometrial carcinoma diagnosis did not differ between carriers with or without surveillance or carriers with endometrial carcinoma before LS diagnosis (p = 0.51). For all endometrial carcinomas together, including index carriers, cumulative incidence was 22.7% at age 70.
In a nation-wide cohort of Lynch syndrome carriers, nearly one-third of eligible carriers did not undergo gynaecological surveillance. Endometrial carcinomas diagnosed during surveillance were slightly more often stage FIGO IA, but this did not seem to substantially decrease the requisite for adjuvant therapy or affect overall survival, questioning effectiveness of current gynaecological management. Prospective research should further assess this, as well as patient preferences.
None.
林奇综合征女性携带者患子宫内膜癌的风险增加。尽管如此,关于子宫内膜癌肿瘤发生的研究仍然很少,并且不存在统一的、基于证据的妇科管理指南。因此,我们描述了一个全国性林奇综合征队列中的妇科监测和手术结果。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,纳入了截至2022年2月28日在荷兰林奇综合征数据库(StOET)中前瞻性登记的林奇综合征女性携带者。携带者与荷兰国家病理学(PALGA)数据库相关联。评估了有/无妇科监测的携带者数量、在林奇综合征诊断之前患有子宫内膜癌的索引携带者数量,以及降低风险手术的接受情况和子宫内膜癌的特征,包括根据当前指南进行辅助治疗的必要性。使用Kaplan-Meier事件发生时间分析来分析子宫内膜癌诊断后的总生存率,在调整竞争风险(死亡和预防性子宫切除术)后计算累积发病率。
总共有1046名登记的林奇综合征女性携带者符合监测条件,其中313名(30.0%)未进行监测,21.4%(1046名中的224名)选择了预防性子宫切除术。在接受监测的携带者中,发现的子宫内膜癌和增生病例比未接受监测的携带者更多(506名接受监测的携带者中有37例子宫内膜癌(7.3%)和28例增生(5.5%),而540名未接受监测的携带者中分别有14例(2.6%)和4例(0.7%);接受监测的携带者通常比未接受监测的携带者年轻(在数据库建立时,中位数分别为56岁[四分位间距48 - 65]和65岁[四分位间距49 - 75];p < 0.0001)。无论是否接受监测,子宫内膜癌主要为子宫内膜样类型且为FIGO IA期。两组各有一名患者需要辅助外照射放疗。子宫内膜癌诊断后的总生存率在接受或未接受监测的携带者之间或在LS诊断前患有子宫内膜癌的携带者之间没有差异(p = 0.51)。对于所有子宫内膜癌,包括索引携带者,70岁时的累积发病率为22.7%。
在一个全国性的林奇综合征携带者队列中,近三分之一符合条件的携带者未接受妇科监测。监测期间诊断出的子宫内膜癌更常为FIGO IA期,但这似乎并未大幅减少辅助治疗的必要性或影响总生存率,这对当前妇科管理的有效性提出了质疑。前瞻性研究应进一步评估这一点以及患者的偏好。
无。