Suppr超能文献

昔日为圣徒,今朝成罪人:电击是恰当还是失当?

Once a saint, now a sinner: An appropriate or inappropriate shock?

作者信息

Mondal Sudipta, Kumar Swasthi S, Vijay Jyothi, Namboodiri Narayanan

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Electrophysiology Division Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology Thiruvananthapuram Kerala India.

出版信息

J Arrhythm. 2025 Jan 10;41(1):e13209. doi: 10.1002/joa3.13209. eCollection 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Critical analysis of electrograms of any therapy delivery event is paramount to identify the etiology, specificity, and sensitivity of the programmed algorithms to differentiate supraventricular versus ventricular tachycardia, its effectiveness, and potential interventions to prevent recurrence. Besides the aspects mentioned above, this case delves into the potential limitations of existing algorithms and the adverse effects of anti-tachycardia pacing.

摘要

对任何治疗交付事件的心电图进行批判性分析对于确定区分室上性与室性心动过速的程控算法的病因、特异性和敏感性、其有效性以及预防复发的潜在干预措施至关重要。除上述方面外,本病例还深入探讨了现有算法的潜在局限性以及抗心动过速起搏的不良反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9781/11730734/9c3f3c8ece06/JOA3-41-e13209-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验