Martinez Kevin A, Haider Aleezay, Tarefder Rafiqul, Khan Zafrul, Meiklejohn Duncan A, Zhu Jay
Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, MSC10 5610, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1811-1816. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11520-4. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
Telemedicine has the potential to increase healthcare access while decreasing the environmental impact associated with providing care. We piloted total perioperative telemedicine (TPT) visits for evaluating patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and environmental impact of TPT by comparing the perioperative and environmental outcomes of patients participating in TPT to those undergoing traditional in-person preoperative evaluations.
During a six-month period in 2022, patients referred to a single provider at an academic tertiary care center for uncomplicated cholelithiasis were offered a preoperative telemedicine visit. Adverse events, number of perioperative clinical visits, and patient demographics were then collected retrospectively for elective cholecystectomies performed between 1/1/2022 and 12/31/2022. Perioperative outcomes were compared between patients who underwent TPT versus those evaluated in-person. Life cycle assessment was utilized to compare greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (measured in kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents, kgCO2-eq) between both groups.
During the study period, 12 patients proceeded with elective cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis after a preoperative telemedicine evaluation while 31 patients did so after an in-person evaluation. Patients participating in TPT had a similar adverse event rate (8.3% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.67, chi-squared test). Patients participating in TPT had more perioperative clinic visits on average compared to patients undergoing in-person preoperative evaluation (1.42 vs. 1.06, p = 0.004). Of the TPT group, 8 patients (67%) patients proceeded with surgery after initial telemedicine evaluation. TPT resulted in a 51% decrease in perioperative GHG emissions compared to patients who underwent in-person evaluation (60.2-60.9 kgCO2-eq vs. 123.4-123.5 kgCO2-eq, p = 0.0271).
This pilot study suggests that TPT is feasible for patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones. Additionally, TPT significantly reduces GHG emissions associated with caring for a patient through an elective procedure by reducing the average number of required trips to the medical facility.
远程医疗有潜力增加医疗服务的可及性,同时减少与提供医疗服务相关的环境影响。我们开展了围手术期全程远程医疗(TPT)问诊,以评估有症状胆结石患者。我们旨在通过比较参与TPT的患者与接受传统面对面术前评估的患者的围手术期和环境结果,来评估TPT的可行性和环境影响。
在2022年的六个月期间,将因单纯性胆结石转诊至一家学术性三级医疗中心的单一医疗服务提供者处的患者提供术前远程医疗问诊。然后回顾性收集2022年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间进行择期胆囊切除术的不良事件、围手术期临床问诊次数和患者人口统计学信息。比较接受TPT的患者与接受面对面评估的患者的围手术期结果。利用生命周期评估来比较两组之间的温室气体(GHG)排放(以二氧化碳当量千克,kgCO2-eq为单位)。
在研究期间,12名患者在术前远程医疗评估后进行了择期胆囊切除术以治疗有症状胆结石,而31名患者在面对面评估后进行了该手术。参与TPT的患者不良事件发生率相似(8.3%对12.9%,p = 0.67,卡方检验)。与接受面对面术前评估的患者相比,参与TPT的患者围手术期平均临床问诊次数更多(1.42对1.06,p = 0.004)。在TPT组中,8名患者(67%)在初次远程医疗评估后进行了手术。与接受面对面评估的患者相比,TPT使围手术期GHG排放减少了51%(60.2 - 60.9 kgCO2-eq对123.4 - 123.5 kgCO2-eq,p = 0.0271)。
这项试点研究表明,TPT对于因有症状胆结石而接受择期胆囊切除术的患者是可行的。此外,TPT通过减少前往医疗机构的平均所需行程次数,显著降低了与通过择期手术护理患者相关的GHG排放。