Tvrdy Taylor, Henry Mélanie, Enoka Roger M
Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States.
J Neurophysiol. 2025 Feb 1;133(2):697-708. doi: 10.1152/jn.00333.2024. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
Our purpose was to compare the influence of the spectral content of motor unit recordings on the calculation of electromechanical delay and on the prediction of force fluctuations from measures of the variability in discharge times and neural drive during steady isometric contractions with the first dorsal interosseus muscle. Participants ( = 42; 60 ± 13 yr) performed contractions at 5% and 20% MVC. After satisfying the inclusion criteria, high-density surface EMG recordings from a subset of 23 participants were decomposed into the discharge times of 530 motor units. The force and cumulative spike train (CST) signals were cross-correlated with a novel filtering approach to determine the electromechanical delay. Force and CST signals were bandpass filtered with three bandwidths (0.75-5 Hz, 0.75-2 Hz, and 2-5 Hz) to determine the influence of spectral content on the precision of the electromechanical delay measurement. Subsequently, the variability in the discharge times of motor units was quantified as the coefficient of variation for interspike interval (CVISI), and the variability in neural drive was represented as the standard deviation of the cumulative spike train (SDCST). The main findings were that all frequencies (0.75-5 Hz) were needed to determine the electromechanical delay and that the force fluctuations were best explained by measures of variability in both discharge times and neural drive (CVISI and SDCST) at 5% MVC force but only the variability in neural drive (SDCST) at 20% MVC force. These findings indicate that the source of the force fluctuations during the steady submaximal contractions with the hand muscle differed for the two target forces. The fluctuations in force during steady submaximal contractions can be caused by either or both the variability in discharge times of individual motor units and in the neural drive. After careful alignment of the force and discharge times within an optimal bandwidth (0.75-5 Hz), the fluctuations in force at the lower target force were strongly correlated with both measures of variability, whereas those at the higher target force were best explained by the variability in neural drive.
我们的目的是比较运动单位记录的频谱内容对等长收缩时第一骨间背侧肌的机电延迟计算以及从放电时间变异性和神经驱动测量值预测力波动的影响。参与者(n = 42;60±13岁)以5%和20%的最大自主收缩(MVC)进行收缩。满足纳入标准后,对23名参与者子集的高密度表面肌电图记录进行分解,得到530个运动单位的放电时间。力信号和累积脉冲序列(CST)信号采用一种新颖的滤波方法进行互相关分析,以确定机电延迟。力信号和CST信号用三种带宽(0.75 - 5 Hz、0.75 - 2 Hz和2 - 5 Hz)进行带通滤波,以确定频谱内容对机电延迟测量精度的影响。随后,将运动单位放电时间的变异性量化为峰间期变异系数(CVISI),神经驱动的变异性表示为累积脉冲序列的标准差(SDCST)。主要发现是,确定机电延迟需要所有频率(0.75 - 5 Hz),并且在5% MVC力时,放电时间和神经驱动的变异性测量值(CVISI和SDCST)能最好地解释力波动,但在20% MVC力时,仅神经驱动的变异性(SDCST)能最好地解释力波动。这些发现表明,手部肌肉在稳定次最大收缩期间力波动的来源在两种目标力下有所不同。稳定次最大收缩期间的力波动可能由单个运动单位放电时间的变异性或神经驱动的变异性或两者共同引起。在最佳带宽(0.75 - 5 Hz)内仔细对齐力和放电时间后,较低目标力时的力波动与两种变异性测量值都密切相关,而较高目标力时的力波动最好由神经驱动的变异性来解释。