Chintapalli Renuka, Chang Stephano, Kaprealian Tania, Savjani Ricky, Tenn Stephen, Bari Ausaf
School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Clin Neurosci. 2025 Mar;133:111050. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111050. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
Tremor, either in patients with Essential Tremor (ET) or Parkinson's disease (PD), constitutes the most common movement disorder. Stereotactic radiosurgery using Gamma Knife (GK) and linear accelerator (LINAC) systems, is an effective, incisionless treatment modality for ET and PD. Although these technologies have been used clinically since the 1990's, most studies have focused on GK, and efficacy, safety and time to treatment effect (latency) of GK and LINAC have not been compared.
We therefore aimed to conduct a systematic review with network meta-analysis examining efficacy, adverse events (AEs) and latency of GK and LINAC for treating tremor in ET and PD.
We conducted a systematic review with network meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, using the Embase and PubMed databases. We included all primary GK/LINAC thalamotomy studies in ET/PD patients with at least 6 months of follow-up, reporting unilateral Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Scale (FTM-TRS) or Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) scores pre-treatment/post-treatment and/or AEs and/or latency. The primary efficacy outcome was FTM-TRS Scale A or UPDRS Item 16 score reduction. AEs were presented as an estimated incidence, and latency as average time to first recorded clinical improvement in tremor.
Six studies of 311 patients and 2 studies of 60 patients met inclusion criteria for GK/LINAC efficacy comparison, respectively. Network meta-analysis showed similar tremor reduction between modalities (standardized mean difference between pre- and post-treatment scores: GK: -2.18 (95 % CI: -2.79, -1.57); LINAC: -2.13 (95 % CI: -5.13, 0.87). GK also had a higher absolute AE rate, while LINAC was associated with a greater latency period. There was no correlation between GK efficacy and AE rate.
Despite the relatively small sample sizes, these results demonstrate similar efficacy between GK and LINAC for ET and PD, with a trend toward higher efficacy but greater AE incidence and slower onset of tremor improvement in GK compared to LINAC.
震颤是特发性震颤(ET)和帕金森病(PD)患者中最常见的运动障碍。使用伽玛刀(GK)和直线加速器(LINAC)系统进行立体定向放射外科手术是治疗ET和PD的一种有效、无创的治疗方式。尽管这些技术自20世纪90年代以来就已应用于临床,但大多数研究都集中在GK上,尚未对GK和LINAC的疗效、安全性及治疗效果出现时间(潜伏期)进行比较。
因此,我们旨在进行一项系统评价及网状Meta分析,以研究GK和LINAC治疗ET和PD震颤的疗效、不良事件(AE)和潜伏期。
我们按照PRISMA指南,使用Embase和PubMed数据库进行了一项系统评价及网状Meta分析。我们纳入了所有对ET/PD患者进行的原发性GK/LINAC丘脑切开术研究,这些研究至少随访6个月,报告了治疗前/治疗后单侧Fahn-Tolosa-Marin震颤量表(FTM-TRS)或统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)评分和/或AE和/或潜伏期。主要疗效指标是FTM-TRS量表A或UPDRS第16项评分降低。AE以估计发生率表示,潜伏期以首次记录到震颤临床改善的平均时间表示。
分别有6项涉及311例患者的研究和2项涉及60例患者的研究符合GK/LINAC疗效比较的纳入标准。网状Meta分析显示,两种治疗方式在震颤减轻方面相似(治疗前和治疗后评分的标准化均数差值:GK:-2.18(95%CI:-2.79,-1.57);LINAC:-2.13(95%CI:-5.13,0.87))。GK的绝对AE发生率也更高,而LINAC的潜伏期更长。GK疗效与AE发生率之间无相关性。
尽管样本量相对较小,但这些结果表明,GK和LINAC治疗ET和PD的疗效相似,与LINAC相比,GK有疗效更高但AE发生率更高且震颤改善起效更慢的趋势。