Neonatal cost savings in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: Economic evaluation of the sFlt-1/PlGF test with real world implementation of biomarkers.

BACKGROUND

Preeclampsia is a key cause of prematurity in the U.S. and incurs significant healthcare costs. An imbalance between soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) and placental growth factor (PlGF) predicts severe preeclampsia and aids in its management.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the sFlt-1/PlGF test as an addition to standard care for patients at risk of developing preeclampsia.

STUDY DESIGN

A decision tree analysis was conducted to assess the cost effectiveness of the ratio test in the United States, using data from Preeclampsia Risk Assessment: Evaluation of Cut-offs to Improve Stratification [PRAECIS] and from a real-world evidence study conducted after the implementation of sFlt-1/PlGF testing into routine clinical practice (Biomarker Examination and Analysis for Clinical Obstetrical Navigation Study [BEACON]). The model compared standard of care alone versus a biomarker-based approach utilizing the sFlt-1/PlGF test for managing patients at risk of preeclampsia with severe features. Published data was used to estimate theoretical cost values of infants for their first six months of life.

RESULTS

The analysis indicated potential total neonatal cost savings of nearly $10,595,332 (95% CI: $6,555,439 to $14,730,536) per 1,000 patients using the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test, translating to about $10,595 saved per patient. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) analysis showed a mean cost savings of $62,572 for each pregnancy prolonged by two weeks.

CONCLUSION

The sFlt-1/PlGF test, when used alongside standard care, enhances risk stratification for severe preeclampsia and may lead to significant neonatal cost savings by reducing preterm deliveries and neonatal intensive care admissions.