Akinlonu Adedoyin, Boffa Michael B, Lyu Chen, Zhong Judy, Jindal Manila, Fadzan Maja, Garshick Michael S, Schwartzbard Arthur, Weintraub Howard S, Bredefeld Cindy, Newman Jonathan D, Fisher Edward A, Koschinsky Marlys L, Goldberg Ira J, Berger Jeffrey S
Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA (Dr Akinlonu, Jindal, Fadzan, Garshick, Schwartzbard, Weintraub, Newman, Fisher, Goldberg and Berger).
Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada (Dr Boffa and Koschinsky).
J Clin Lipidol. 2025 Jan-Feb;19(1):39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2024.11.008. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a driver of residual cardiovascular risk. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) decrease Lp(a) with significant heterogeneity in response. We investigated contributors to the heterogeneous response. METHODS: Cholesterol Reduction and Residual Risk in Diabetes (CHORD) was a prospective study examining lipid lowering in participants with a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > 100 mg/dL with and without diabetes (DM) on lipid lowering therapy (LLT) for 30-days with evolocumab 140 mg every 14 days combined with either atorvastatin 80 mg or ezetimibe 10 mg daily. Lp(a) level was measured by immunoturbidometry, and the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoform size was measured by denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis and Western blotting. We examined the change in Lp(a) levels from baseline to 30 days. RESULTS: Among 150 participants (mean age 50 years, 58% female, 50% non-White, 17% Hispanic, 50% DM), median (interquartile range) Lp(a) was 27.5 (8-75) mg/dL at baseline and 23 (3-68) mg/dL at 30 days, leading to a 10% (0-36) median reduction (P < .001). Among 73 (49%) participants with Lp(a) ≥ 30 mg/dL at baseline, there was a 15% (3-25) median reduction in Lp(a) (P < .001). While baseline Lp(a) level was not correlated with change in Lp(a) (r = 0.04, P = .59), apo(a) size directly correlated with Lp(a) reduction (P < .001). After adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, DM, and type of LLT, apo(a) size remained positively associated with a reduction in Lp(a) (Beta 0.95, 95% confidence interval, 0.93-0.97, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate variation in Lp(a) reduction with potent LLT. Change in Lp(a) was strongly associated with apo(a) isoform size.
J Lipid Res. 2022-8
JAMA Cardiol. 2022-7-1
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2022-3
Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2022-5
Clin Chem. 2021-1-8
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020-1-21