Kreimer Fabienne, Lewenhardt Marie, El-Battrawy Ibrahim, Haghikia Arash, Gotzmann Michael
Department of Cardiology II - Rhythmology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Department of Cardiology and Rhythmology, St. Josef-Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum, Gudrunstraße 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):2480. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86022-x.
Studies have demonstrated overall prognostic benefits of ICD implantation in patients at increased risk of sudden cardiac death. However, results are inconsistent in certain subgroups. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic implications of comorbidities on ICD outcomes and compare trends in patient selection and outcomes over a decade-long inclusion period. This study analysed 422 patients undergoing ICD implantation between 2011 and 2020. The study endpoint "no-benefit" was characterized by death from any cause occurring without prior appropriate ICD therapy. Benefit of ICD implantation was defined as either receiving appropriate ICD therapy before death or surviving until the end of the observation period. During a mean follow-up of 4.2 ± 3.0 years, no-benefit of ICD implantation was observed in 84 patients (20%). Independent risk factors for no-benefit were age ≥ 68 years (HR 4.599, p < 0.001), anemia (HR 2.549, p < 0.001), peripheral artery disease (HR 2.066, p = 0.007), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 1.939, p = 0.014). Subgroup analysis by age < 68 years and ≥ 68 years demonstrated that the risk of no-benefit increases with age and comorbidities. When comparing patients with ICD implantation in 2011-2015 with those in 2016-2020, there were no significant differences in one-, two- and three-year-no-benefit rates. Different comorbidities were associated with no-benefit in the early and late implantation groups. Risk factors such as older age and specific comorbidities are associated with a higher likelihood of no-benefit from ICD implantation. A careful patient selection and consideration of individual risk factors besides advanced age is important.
研究表明,植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)对心脏性猝死风险增加的患者具有总体预后益处。然而,某些亚组的结果并不一致。本研究旨在评估合并症对ICD治疗结果的预后影响,并比较长达十年纳入期内患者选择和治疗结果的趋势。本研究分析了2011年至2020年间接受ICD植入的422例患者。研究终点“无益处”的定义为在未接受过适当ICD治疗的情况下因任何原因死亡。ICD植入的益处定义为在死亡前接受适当的ICD治疗或存活至观察期结束。在平均4.2±3.0年的随访期间,84例患者(20%)未观察到ICD植入的益处。无益处的独立危险因素为年龄≥68岁(风险比[HR]4.599,p<0.001)、贫血(HR 2.549,p<0.001)、外周动脉疾病(HR 2.066,p=0.007)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(HR 1.939,p=0.014)。按年龄<68岁和≥68岁进行的亚组分析表明,无益处的风险随年龄和合并症增加。比较2011 - 2015年和2016 - 2020年接受ICD植入的患者,1年、2年和3年无益处率无显著差异。不同合并症在早期和晚期植入组与无益处相关。年龄较大和特定合并症等危险因素与ICD植入无益处的可能性较高相关。除高龄外,仔细选择患者并考虑个体危险因素很重要。