Skiadopoulos Andreas, Knikou Maria
Klab4Recovery Research Program, The City University of New York, Staten Island, New York, United States of America.
Department of Physical Therapy, College of Staten Island, The City University of New York, Staten Island, New York, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 22;20(1):e0317218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317218. eCollection 2025.
Recruitment input-output curves of transspinal evoked potentials that represent the net output of spinal neuronal networks during which cortical, spinal and peripheral inputs are integrated as well as motor evoked potentials and H-reflexes are used extensively in research as neurophysiological biomarkers to establish physiological or pathological motor behavior and post-treatment recovery. A comparison between different sigmoidal models to fit the transspinal evoked potentials recruitment curve and estimate the parameters of physiological importance has not been performed. This study sought to address this gap by fitting eight sigmoidal models (Boltzmann, Hill, Log-Logistic, Log-Normal, Weibull-1, Weibull-2, Gompertz, Extreme Value Function) to the transspinal evoked potentials recruitment curves of soleus and tibialis anterior recorded under four different cathodal stimulation settings. The sigmoidal models were ranked based on the Akaike information criterion, and their performance was assessed in terms of Akaike differences and weights values. Additionally, an interclass correlation coefficient between the predicted parameters derived from the best models fitted to the recruitment curves was also established. A Bland-Altman analysis was conducted to evaluate the agreement between the predicted parameters from the best models. The findings revealed a muscle dependency, with the Boltzmann and Hill models identified as the best fits for the soleus, while the Extreme Value Function and Boltzmann models were optimal for the tibialis anterior transspinal evoked potentials recruitment curves. Excellent agreement for the upper asymptote, slope, and inflection point parameters was found between Boltzmann and Hill models for the soleus, and for the slope and inflection point parameters between Extreme Value Function and Boltzmann models for the tibialis anterior. Notably, the Boltzmann model for soleus and the Extreme Value Function model for tibialis anterior exhibited less susceptibility to inaccuracies in estimated parameters. Based on these findings, we suggest the Boltzmann and the Extreme Value Function models for fitting the soleus and the tibialis anterior transspinal evoked potentials recruitment curve, respectively.
经脊髓诱发电位的募集输入-输出曲线代表脊髓神经网络的净输出,在此过程中,皮层、脊髓和外周输入相互整合,同时运动诱发电位和H反射作为神经生理生物标志物在研究中被广泛用于建立生理或病理运动行为以及治疗后恢复情况。尚未对不同的S形模型进行比较,以拟合经脊髓诱发电位募集曲线并估计具有生理重要性的参数。本研究试图通过将八个S形模型(玻尔兹曼模型、希尔模型、对数逻辑斯蒂模型、对数正态模型、威布尔-1模型、威布尔-2模型、冈珀茨模型、极值函数模型)拟合到在四种不同阴极刺激设置下记录的比目鱼肌和胫骨前肌的经脊髓诱发电位募集曲线来填补这一空白。根据赤池信息准则对S形模型进行排序,并根据赤池差异和权重值评估其性能。此外,还建立了拟合到募集曲线的最佳模型所推导的预测参数之间的组内相关系数。进行了布兰德-奥特曼分析以评估最佳模型预测参数之间的一致性。研究结果显示出肌肉依赖性,其中玻尔兹曼模型和希尔模型被确定为最适合比目鱼肌的模型,而极值函数模型和玻尔兹曼模型则是胫骨前肌经脊髓诱发电位募集曲线的最佳模型。对于比目鱼肌,在玻尔兹曼模型和希尔模型之间,上渐近线、斜率和拐点参数具有极好的一致性;对于胫骨前肌,在极值函数模型和玻尔兹曼模型之间,斜率和拐点参数具有极好的一致性。值得注意的是,比目鱼肌的玻尔兹曼模型和胫骨前肌的极值函数模型在估计参数不准确时表现出较低的敏感性。基于这些发现,我们建议分别使用玻尔兹曼模型和极值函数模型来拟合比目鱼肌和胫骨前肌的经脊髓诱发电位募集曲线。