Vos Eline E, van der Beek Allard J, de Bruin Simone R, Proper Karin I
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Center for Prevention, Lifestyle and Health, Department Behaviour and Health, Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721 MA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2025 May;51(3):181-190. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4208. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
Many employees combine their work with informal care responsibilities for family and friends, potentially impacting their well-being and sustained employability. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a workplace participatory approach (PA) intervention in supporting working caregivers to prevent and solve problems related to balancing work, private life, and informal care tasks.
We conducted a two-armed randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN15363783) in which working caregivers either received the PA (N=57), under guidance of an occupational professional serving as process facilitator, or usual care (N=59). We recruited 125 working caregivers from four Dutch organizations. Questionnaire-based measurements were assessed at baseline, 4, and 7 months. The primary outcome was work-life imbalance. Secondary outcomes were perceived social support from supervisors and colleagues, role overload, distress and perceived burden of combining work and informal care. Intervention effects were analyzed using intention-to-treat analysis and linear mixed models.
The PA was not effective in reducing work-life imbalance, improving support from colleagues or reducing role overload, distress and perceived burden of combining work and informal care. However, the PA significantly improved perceived social support from supervisors at 4 months [β=0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.88] and 7 months (β=0.36, 95% CI 0.02-0.70). Interaction effects indicated that improvement in supervisor support varied depending on the organization.
The PA improved supervisor support but not work-life imbalance. Further research should explore PA effects on working caregivers with and without balance issues and the role of supervisor support in reducing work-life conflict.
许多员工在工作的同时还承担着对家人和朋友的非正式护理责任,这可能会影响他们的幸福感和持续就业能力。本研究旨在调查一种工作场所参与式方法(PA)干预措施在支持在职护理人员预防和解决与平衡工作、私人生活和非正式护理任务相关问题方面的有效性。
我们进行了一项双臂随机对照试验(ISRCTN15363783),在职护理人员要么在职业专业人员作为过程促进者的指导下接受PA干预(N = 57),要么接受常规护理(N = 59)。我们从四个荷兰组织招募了125名在职护理人员。在基线、4个月和7个月时进行基于问卷的测量。主要结果是工作与生活失衡。次要结果是来自上级和同事的感知社会支持、角色过载、困扰以及对工作与非正式护理相结合的感知负担。使用意向性分析和线性混合模型分析干预效果。
PA在减少工作与生活失衡、改善同事支持或减少角色过载、困扰以及对工作与非正式护理相结合的感知负担方面无效。然而,PA在4个月时显著改善了来自上级的感知社会支持[β = 0.54,95%置信区间(CI)0.21 - 0.88],在7个月时也显著改善了[β = 0.36,95%CI 0.02 - 0.70]。交互作用表明,上级支持的改善因组织而异。
PA改善了上级支持,但没有改善工作与生活失衡。进一步的研究应探讨PA对有和没有平衡问题的在职护理人员的影响,以及上级支持在减少工作与生活冲突中的作用。