Kalmar Christopher L, White-Dzuro Colin G, Mok Jean W, Perdikis Galen
From the Department of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Ann Plast Surg. 2025 Feb 1;94(2):152-156. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004153. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
While there is mounting evidence that closed suction drains are not necessary, there is a paucity of literature to demonstrate that drains are harmful after breast reduction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of drains on postoperative seroma, hematoma, and infection, as well as elucidate any risk factors that may be implicated in the development of these complications.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all reduction mammaplasty procedures at our university medical center between 2010-2020. Pedicle type, skin incision, drain utilization, breast excision mass, sternal notch to nipple distance, and inframammary fold to nipple distance were analyzed with postoperative outcomes including hematoma, seroma, infection, dehiscence, nipple necrosis, and fat necrosis.
This study included 944 female patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Median age was 39.0 years, median body mass index was 31.9 kg/m2, and median breast mass resected was 742 grams per side. Drain utilization did not significantly reduce postoperative hematoma (P = 0.196), seroma (P = 0.185), nipple necrosis (P = 0.511), or fat necrosis (P = 0.113), but drain utilization significantly increased postoperative surgical site infection (P = 0.011). Patients with breast mass removed over 1500 g had significantly higher risk of hematoma (P = 0.002), fat necrosis (P < 0.001), and nipple necrosis (P < 0.001) compared to patients with less than 1500 g removed. In patients with greater than 1500 g resected, drain utilization did not significantly decrease risk of hematoma (P = 0.086) or seroma (P = 0.497).
Breast reduction greater than 1500 g per side significantly increased risk of hematoma, nipple necrosis, and fat necrosis. Drain utilization did not demonstrate any advantageous effects, rather it increased risk of infection. Future multicenter study will be needed to confirm these findings across different patient referral networks and practice patterns.
虽然越来越多的证据表明闭式引流并非必要,但缺乏文献证明乳房缩小术后引流有害。本研究的目的是调查引流对术后血清肿、血肿和感染的影响,并阐明可能与这些并发症发生相关的任何风险因素。
对2010年至2020年在我们大学医学中心进行的所有乳房缩小成形术进行回顾性队列研究。分析蒂型、皮肤切口、引流使用情况、乳房切除肿块、胸骨切迹至乳头距离以及乳房下皱襞至乳头距离,并观察术后结果,包括血肿、血清肿、感染、裂开、乳头坏死和脂肪坏死。
本研究纳入了944例行乳房缩小成形术的女性患者。中位年龄为39.0岁,中位体重指数为31.9kg/m²,每侧切除的乳房肿块中位重量为742克。引流使用并未显著降低术后血肿(P = 0.196)、血清肿(P = 0.185)、乳头坏死(P = 0.511)或脂肪坏死(P = 0.113)的发生率,但引流使用显著增加了术后手术部位感染的发生率(P = 0.011)。与切除量小于1500克的患者相比,切除乳房肿块超过1500克的患者发生血肿(P = 0.002)、脂肪坏死(P < 0.001)和乳头坏死(P < 0.001)的风险显著更高。在切除量大于1500克的患者中,引流使用并未显著降低血肿(P = 0.086)或血清肿(P = 0.497)的风险。
每侧乳房缩小量大于1500克会显著增加血肿、乳头坏死和脂肪坏死的风险。引流使用未显示出任何有益效果,反而增加了感染风险。未来需要多中心研究来在不同患者转诊网络和实践模式中证实这些发现。