• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

红胸综合征——它去了哪里?:对红胸综合征发病率随时间变化的系统评价。

Red Breast Syndrome-Where Has It Gone?: A Systematic Review of Red Breast Syndrome Incidence Overtime.

作者信息

Navarro Yelissa, Makarewicz Nathan, Hinson Chandler, Thawanyarat Kometh, Coleman-Belin Janet, Loan Phillip, Modi Suraj, Nazerali Rahim S

机构信息

From the Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA.

Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2025 Feb 1;94(2):243-249. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004151. Epub 2024 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004151
PMID:39841901
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Red breast syndrome (RBS) has been noted in past literature as a possible complication of implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) with the use of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs). Since its first appearance in 2009, RBS has drawn growing medical attention with reported incidence ranging from 7%-9%. There has been a noted decrease in the emergence of RBS despite its inclusion among the analyzed complications in a number of studies. This systematic review aims to evaluate the trend in reported RBS incidence over time and appropriately determine an accurate incidence of RBS from reported literature since the emergence of the phenomena.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed in July 2023 that analyzed the incidence of RBS among retrospective cohort studies on complication rates of IBBR with ADM. Patient demographics, RBS incidence rates, and all-cause complications were captured. The review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines and Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies criteria was used to assess study quality.

RESULTS

From 2009 to 2023, a total of 48 studies (n = 6251) met inclusion criteria of which 35 studies from 2017 to 2023 were not already included in a prior systematic review (n = 5246). The mean incidence of RBS in the unreported studies was 2.88% with a weighted mean of 3.22%. Analysis of the trend in RBS over time shows an increasing reported incidence rate from 2009 with a peak in incidence between 2016 and 2017, followed by a steady decline through 2022. Twenty-six of the studies were published from 2016 to 2019.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of RBS among prior studies and systematic reviews has fluctuated significantly since its initial emergence in 2009. Reported incidence rates have been on the decline since 2018 with a true weighted incidence of 3.22% from analysis of recent reported studies. Potential causes for the decline in incidence include practice changes in ADM preparation, changes in the ADM brand used for IBBR, and improved categorization of RBS compared to cellulitis/infection. Despite more robust criteria for diagnosis, no consensus for management has yet been established.

摘要

背景

在以往文献中,红色乳房综合征(RBS)被认为是使用脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)进行植入式乳房重建(IBBR)可能出现的一种并发症。自2009年首次出现以来,RBS受到了越来越多的医学关注,报告的发病率在7%-9%之间。尽管在多项研究的分析并发症中都包括了RBS,但该综合征的出现已明显减少。本系统评价旨在评估报告的RBS发病率随时间的变化趋势,并根据该现象出现以来的报告文献适当确定RBS的准确发病率。

方法

2023年7月进行了一项系统文献综述,分析了在关于使用ADM的IBBR并发症发生率的回顾性队列研究中RBS的发生率。收集了患者人口统计学数据、RBS发病率和全因并发症情况。该综述按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南进行,采用非随机研究的方法学指数标准评估研究质量。

结果

2009年至2023年,共有48项研究(n = 6251)符合纳入标准,其中2017年至2023年的35项研究未被纳入之前的系统评价(n = 5246)。未报告研究中RBS的平均发病率为2.88%,加权平均发病率为3.22%。对RBS随时间变化趋势的分析表明,自2009年以来报告的发病率呈上升趋势,在2016年至2017年发病率达到峰值,随后到2022年稳步下降。其中26项研究发表于2016年至2019年。

结论

自2009年首次出现以来,之前研究和系统评价中RBS的发病率波动显著。自2018年以来,报告的发病率一直在下降,根据近期报告研究的分析,实际加权发病率为3.22%。发病率下降的潜在原因包括ADM制备方法的改变、用于IBBR的ADM品牌的变化以及与蜂窝织炎/感染相比,RBS的分类有所改进。尽管诊断标准更加严格,但尚未建立管理方面的共识。

相似文献

1
Red Breast Syndrome-Where Has It Gone?: A Systematic Review of Red Breast Syndrome Incidence Overtime.红胸综合征——它去了哪里?:对红胸综合征发病率随时间变化的系统评价。
Ann Plast Surg. 2025 Feb 1;94(2):243-249. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004151. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
2
Reducing postoperative infections and red breast syndrome in patients with acellular dermal matrix-based breast reconstruction: the relative roles of product sterility and lower body mass index.降低基于脱细胞真皮基质的乳房重建患者术后感染和红胸综合征的发生率:产品无菌性和较低体重指数的相对作用
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 May;74 Suppl 1:S30-2. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000475.
3
A comparison of acellular dermal matrices (ADM) efficacy and complication profile in women undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.基于植入物的乳房重建女性中脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)的疗效和并发症情况比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMC Cancer. 2024 Dec 31;24(1):1598. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13359-3.
4
Does the use of Acellular Dermal Matrices (ADM) in women undergoing pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction increase operative success versus non-use of ADM in the same setting? A systematic review.在同样的情况下,与不使用脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)相比,在接受假体乳房重建的女性中使用 ADM 是否会增加手术成功率?一项系统评价。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1186. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12978-0.
5
Implant Based Breast Reconstruction Using a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TiLOOP® Bra): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.钛涂层聚丙烯网(TiLOOP® Bra)在乳房重建中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Mar;48(5):925-935. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03500-1. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
6
Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.脱细胞真皮基质一期植入式乳房重建与两期乳房重建(BRIOS)后生活质量和患者满意度比较:一项随机对照试验的主要结局。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Sep;19(9):1205-1214. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30378-4. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
7
Does the use of acellular dermal matrices (ADM) in women undergoing pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction increase operative success versus non-use of ADM in the same setting? A systematic review protocol.在同一环境下,与不使用脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)相比,在接受经胸肌前置假体乳房重建的女性中使用 ADM 是否会增加手术成功率?系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 7;13(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02564-7.
8
Immediate Breast Cancer Reconstruction with or without Dermal Matrix or Synthetic Mesh Support: A Review and Network Meta-Analysis.使用或不使用真皮基质或合成网片支撑的即时乳腺癌重建:一项综述与网状Meta分析
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Apr 1;151(4):563e-574e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009984. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
9
Use of 801 Acellular Dermal Matrices (ADMs) in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Clinical Observation of Complication Profiles Over a 7-Year Period.
Aesthet Surg J. 2025 Feb 18;45(3):276-285. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjae238.
10
Efficacy of Acellular Dermal Matrix Type in Treatment of Capsular Contracture in Breast Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.脱细胞真皮基质类型在隆胸包膜挛缩治疗中的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Aesthet Surg J. 2023 Dec 14;44(1):26-35. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad265.