Severino Paolo, D'Amato Andrea, Prosperi Silvia, Mariani Marco Valerio, Cestiè Claudia, Myftari Vincenzo, Labbro Francia Aurora, Marek-Iannucci Stefanie, Manzi Giovanna, Filomena Domenico, Maestrini Viviana, Mancone Massimo, Badagliacca Roberto, Vizza Carmine Dario, Fedele Francesco
Department of Clinical, Internal, Anesthesiology and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy.
IRCCS San Raffaele Cassino, 03043, Cassino, Italy.
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2025;23(3):213-223. doi: 10.2174/0115701611334141241217044516.
The management of acute heart failure (AHF) is crucial and challenging. Regarding the use of inotropes, correct patient selection and time of administration are of the essence. We hypothesize that the early use of Levosimendan favouring hemodynamic stabilization and enables rapid optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with HF, eventually impacting the patient's prognosis during the vulnerable phase.
This prospective, observational study enrolled consecutive patients admitted due to AHF. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis has been used to homogenize differences between groups. In group 1 (G1), patients were treated with early 24-h Levosimendan infusion followed by in-hospital introduction/up-titration of GDMT. In group 2 (G2), patients were treated with alternative inotropes/ vasopressors followed by in-hospital introduction/up-titration of GDMT. The comparison between the two groups has been performed at the 6-month follow-up in terms of cardiovascular (CV) mortality and HF hospitalizations (HFH).
233 patients were included in the present study, and after propensity match adjustments, 176 patients were analysed, 88 patients for each group. No differences in the baseline characteristics have been reported between the groups. At 6 months follow-up, no statistically significant differences were shown in terms of the composite endpoint of CV death and HFH (p = 0.445) and CV death (p = 0.62). Statistically significant differences between the two groups were reported in terms of HFH (p = 0.02). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients in G1 were significantly less hospitalized compared to G2 during the 6 months after the index hospitalization (log-rank p = 0.03).
Early 24-hour infusion of Levosimendan followed by rapid optimization of HF diseasemodifying therapies results in a significant reduction of HFH in the vulnerable post-discharge phase.
急性心力衰竭(AHF)的管理至关重要且具有挑战性。关于正性肌力药物的使用,正确的患者选择和给药时间至关重要。我们假设早期使用左西孟旦有利于血流动力学稳定,并能在心力衰竭患者中快速优化指南导向的药物治疗(GDMT),最终在脆弱期影响患者的预后。
这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了因AHF入院的连续患者。倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析用于使组间差异同质化。在第1组(G1)中,患者接受早期24小时左西孟旦输注,随后在院内引入/上调GDMT。在第2组(G2)中,患者接受替代正性肌力药物/血管升压药治疗,随后在院内引入/上调GDMT。两组之间的比较在6个月随访时进行,比较心血管(CV)死亡率和心力衰竭住院(HFH)情况。
本研究纳入233例患者,经过倾向匹配调整后,分析了176例患者,每组88例。两组之间未报告基线特征存在差异。在6个月随访时,CV死亡和HFH的复合终点(p = 0.445)和CV死亡(p = 0.62)方面未显示出统计学上的显著差异。两组之间在HFH方面报告了统计学上的显著差异(p = 0.02)。Kaplan-Meier生存分析表明,在索引住院后的6个月内,G1组患者的住院次数明显少于G2组(对数秩p = 0.03)。
早期24小时输注左西孟旦,随后快速优化心力衰竭疾病改善治疗,可使出院后脆弱期的HFH显著减少。