Hu Zhenghui, Sun Chen, Heng Hongquan, Li Jian, Chen Hainan, Chen Fuchao, Su Peng, Wang Dengfeng
Department of Orthopedics Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Department of Central Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Orthop Surg. 2025 Apr;17(4):1045-1056. doi: 10.1111/os.14351. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
Inferior pole patellar fractures (IPPFs) pose a significant challenge due to their complex fracture patterns and high risk of complications associated with current treatment methods. This study aims to (1) characterize the fracture patterns of IPPFs using fracture mapping and (2) compare the biomechanical stability and clinical outcomes of treatment with anchor suture with patellar cerclage versus Kirschner-wire tension band combined with patellar cerclage.
(1) A retrospective analysis was conducted on 61 patients with IPPF. For each case, fracture reduction was manually simulated, with fracture lines and fragments overlaid onto a complete patella template to identify fracture patterns. (2) Finite-element models were used to analyze the mechanical properties of anchor suture and titanium cable cerclage treatment and Kirschner-wire tension band combined with patellar cerclage in treating IPPFs. Additionally, a retrospective analysis of clinical data was performed on 57 patients with IPPF (AO/OTA 34 A1) treated at our institution between January 1, 2023, and December 25, 2023. Of these, 18 patients underwent anchor suture and titanium cable cerclage (Group A), and 39 underwent Kirschner-wire tension band combined with patellar cerclage (Group B). We compared operative time, final knee range of motion, incidence of secondary surgery, postoperative complications, and functional recovery between the two groups based on medical records and follow-up results.
(1) IPPFs were predominantly comminuted, with fracture lines on the anterior view concentrated laterally and near the superior surface of the inferior pole. Fracture lines became more sparse as they approached the distal patella. The posterior view was similar to the anterior, with the majority of fractures near the superior surface of the inferior pole. (2) Finite-element analysis revealed no significant differences between the two groups in terms of displacement and stress. Operative time was similar between the groups (p > 0.05), as were final knee range of motion (p > 0.05) and postoperative Bostman scores (p > 0.05). Group A had no postoperative complications or readmissions, while Group B had two cases of hardware irritation and one case of knee joint infection.
The fracture lines of IPPF are varied, often comminuted, and correlate with the mechanism of injury. Biomechanical and clinical outcomes suggest that anchor suture with patellar cerclage is a viable option for stabilizing IPPF.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06736639.
髌下极骨折(IPPFs)因其复杂的骨折模式以及当前治疗方法相关的高并发症风险而构成重大挑战。本研究旨在:(1)使用骨折图谱描述IPPFs的骨折模式;(2)比较锚钉缝合联合髌骨环扎与克氏针张力带联合髌骨环扎治疗的生物力学稳定性和临床结果。
(1)对61例IPPF患者进行回顾性分析。对于每例病例,手动模拟骨折复位,将骨折线和骨折块叠加在完整的髌骨模板上以识别骨折模式。(2)使用有限元模型分析锚钉缝合和钛缆环扎治疗以及克氏针张力带联合髌骨环扎治疗IPPFs的力学性能。此外,对2023年1月1日至2023年12月25日在本机构接受治疗的57例IPPF(AO/OTA 34 A1)患者的临床数据进行回顾性分析。其中,18例患者接受锚钉缝合和钛缆环扎(A组),39例接受克氏针张力带联合髌骨环扎(B组)。我们根据病历和随访结果比较两组之间的手术时间、最终膝关节活动范围、二次手术发生率、术后并发症和功能恢复情况。
(1)IPPFs主要为粉碎性骨折,前视图上的骨折线集中在外侧且靠近下极的上表面。骨折线越靠近髌骨远端越稀疏。后视图与前视图相似,大多数骨折位于下极的上表面附近。(2)有限元分析显示两组在位移和应力方面无显著差异。两组的手术时间相似(p>0.05),最终膝关节活动范围(p>0.05)和术后Bostman评分也相似(p>0.05)。A组无术后并发症或再次入院情况,而B组有2例内固定刺激和1例膝关节感染。
IPPF的骨折线多样,常为粉碎性,且与损伤机制相关。生物力学和临床结果表明,锚钉缝合联合髌骨环扎是稳定IPPF的可行选择。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06736639。