Lombardo Paolo, Mussetto Ilaria, Baccolini Valentina, Di Rosa Enrico, Sinopoli Alessandra
Department of Public Health and Infectious Disease, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Department of Prevention, Local Health Authority Roma 1, Borgo Santo Spirito, 3, 00193 Rome, Italy.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jan 4;15(1):47. doi: 10.3390/bs15010047.
Patients with mental illnesses adhere to organized cancer screening programs less frequently than the general population. This systematic review aims to examine the literature to identify studies that evaluate interventions designed to increase cancer screening adherence in people with mental disorders. The review protocol was registered (CRD42024510431) and Pubmed and Scopus were searched up to January 2024. Breast, colorectal, or cervical cancer screening were considered. We adhered to the PROSPERO guidelines. Study quality was assessed. Overall, six articles were included: two RCT studies, two before-after studies, and two cohort studies. Four interventions were conducted in the USA, one in Canada, and one in Japan. Two studies evaluated all three cancer screening programs, two studies evaluated breast cancer screenings, and two studies evaluated colorectal cancer screenings. The proposed interventions included patient navigation, case management, and support from staff members along with educational modules, decision counselling sessions, and enhanced primary care. The most consistent improvements in screening adherence were observed in breast and colorectal cancer screenings compared to usual care, particularly through interventions like patient navigation (colorectal cancer: 47.1% vs. 11.8%, < 0.001) and case management. Further evaluations of interventions and their costs are still needed.
患有精神疾病的患者比普通人群更少参与有组织的癌症筛查项目。本系统评价旨在查阅文献,以识别评估旨在提高精神障碍患者癌症筛查依从性的干预措施的研究。该评价方案已注册(CRD42024510431),截至2024年1月检索了PubMed和Scopus数据库。纳入了乳腺癌、结直肠癌或宫颈癌筛查相关研究。我们遵循了PROSPERO指南,并对研究质量进行了评估。总体而言,共纳入6篇文章:2篇随机对照试验研究、2篇前后对照研究和2篇队列研究。4项干预措施在美国实施,1项在加拿大实施,1项在日本实施。2项研究评估了所有三种癌症筛查项目,2项研究评估了乳腺癌筛查,2项研究评估了结直肠癌筛查。所提出的干预措施包括患者导航、病例管理、工作人员的支持以及教育模块、决策咨询会议和强化初级保健。与常规护理相比,在乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查中观察到筛查依从性最一致的改善,特别是通过患者导航(结直肠癌:47.1%对11.8%,<0.001)和病例管理等干预措施。仍需要对干预措施及其成本进行进一步评估。