AIM

Cryptoglandular anal fistulas carry a substantial burden to quality of life. Surgery is the only effective curative treatment but requires balancing fistula healing against pain, wounds and continence impairment. Sphincter-preserving procedures do exist but demonstrate variable rates of success. A lack of consistency and precision in outcome reporting and methodological quality hinders effective evidence-based decision-making. We aimed to establish a series of minimum reporting standards for interventional studies in idiopathic anal fistula, to eradicate low-quality studies, thus providing a consistent baseline of useful evidence.

METHODS

An international group of 16 experts participated in a modified nominal group technique consensus. The nominal question was: 'What should be the minimum set of reporting standards for studies of intervention in idiopathic anal fistula?' The process was conducted between May and June 2023, culminating in a hybrid in-person/virtual meeting that took place at the Songdo International Proctology Symposium in June 2023.

RESULTS

Initial idea generation resulted in 37 statements within the first round. Themes included variable reporting of follow-up and incontinence. Participants indicated their agreement via a 9-point Likert scale. Any statement achieving >70% consensus was retained. Subsequent group discussion condensed the list to 11 statements for further voting and a final minimum set of 12 reporting standards was created.

CONCLUSION

To date, this is the first study dedicated to developing minimum reporting standards for interventional studies in idiopathic anal fistula using a modified nominal group technique. These standards will instruct researchers in producing meticulous, high-quality studies that are accurate, transparent and reproducible.