Suppr超能文献

免疫功能受损人群中两种新冠病毒T细胞检测的一致性低且无效对照频繁。

Low agreement and frequent invalid controls in two SARS-CoV-2 T-cell assays in people with compromised immune function.

作者信息

Audigé Annette, Amstutz Alain, Schuurmans Macé M, Amico Patrizia, Braun Dominique L, Stoeckle Marcel P, Hasse Barbara, Hage René, Damm Dominik, Tamm Michael, Mueller Nicolas J, Günthard Huldrych F, Koller Michael T, Schönenberger Christof M, Griessbach Alexandra, Labhardt Niklaus D, Kouyos Roger D, Trkola Alexandra, Huber Michael, Kusejko Katharina, Bucher Heiner C, Abela Irene A, Briel Matthias, Chammartin Frédérique, Speich Benjamin

机构信息

Institute of Medical Virology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0317965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317965. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

T-cell response plays an important role in SARS-CoV-2 immunogenicity. For people living with HIV (PWH) and solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients there is limited evidence on the reliability of commercially available T-cell tests. We assessed 173 blood samples from 81 participants (62 samples from 35 PWH; 111 samples from 46 SOT recipients [lung and kidney]) with two commercial SARS-CoV-2 Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) release assays (IGRA; SARS-CoV-2 IGRA by Euroimmun, and IGRA SARS-CoV-2 by Roche). The reliability between the tests was judged as low (Cohen's kappa [κ] = 0.20; overall percent agreement [OPA] = 66%). A high proportion of tests were invalid (22% Euroimmun; 8% Roche). When excluding these invalid tests, the agreement was higher (κ  =  0.43; OPA = 90%). The low reliability between the two T-cell tests indicates that results should be interpreted with caution in SOT recipients and PWH and that SARS-CoV-2 T-cell tests need to be optimized and further validated for use in vulnerable patient populations.

摘要

T细胞反应在新型冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)免疫原性中起重要作用。对于感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的人(PWH)和实体器官移植(SOT)受者,关于市售T细胞检测可靠性的证据有限。我们使用两种市售的SARS-CoV-2干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)释放检测方法(IGRA;欧蒙公司的SARS-CoV-2 IGRA和罗氏公司的IGRA SARS-CoV-2)对81名参与者的173份血样进行了评估(35名PWH的62份血样;46名SOT受者[肺和肾]的111份血样)。两种检测方法之间的可靠性被判定为较低(科恩kappa系数[κ]=0.20;总体一致性百分比[OPA]=66%)。很大一部分检测结果无效(欧蒙公司的为22%;罗氏公司的为8%)。排除这些无效检测结果后,一致性更高(κ=0.43;OPA=90%)。两种T细胞检测方法之间的低可靠性表明,在SOT受者和PWH中对检测结果的解释应谨慎,并且SARS-CoV-2 T细胞检测需要针对脆弱患者群体进行优化和进一步验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dcc/11761106/70a86c219432/pone.0317965.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验