Fujimoto Chisato, Kawahara Takuya, Kikkawa Yayoi S, Kinoshita Makoto, Kamogashira Teru, Oka Mineko, Uranaka Tsukasa, Egami Naoya, Ichijo Kentaro, Kabaya Kayoko, Katsumi Sachiyo, Takashima Ikumi, Yamamoto Yoshiharu, Yagi Masato, Yamasoba Tatsuya, Iwasaki Shinichi
Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Otolaryngology, Tokyo Teishin Hospital, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0317822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317822. eCollection 2025.
This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial aimed to evaluate whether prolonged noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation improves body balance in patients with vestibulopathy.
This trial was registered in the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center Clinical Trials Information registry (jRCT1080224083). Subjects were 20- to 85-year-old patients who had been unsteady for more than one year and whose symptoms had persisted despite more than six months of rehabilitation. Enrolled subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups; one group received the optimal intensity of noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation first and then the placebo 14 days later, the other was evaluated in the reverse order. The primary outcome was the difference of the mean percent change from the baseline in the velocity of center of pressure during 3 h of stimulation between the noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation and placebo periods. This was analyzed with the mixed effects model.
Forty-two subjects were enrolled. The mean percent change in the velocity during stimulation for 3 h was -9.3% (SD 19.9%) for noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation and -12.6% (SD 15.0%) for placebo. No significant effects of noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation over placebo were found for velocity in the least-squares means of the difference [3.1% (95% CI -0.2 to 6.4, p = 0.066)].
Prolonged noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation did not significantly improve body balance in patients with poorly-compensated vestibulopathy.
这项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉试验旨在评估延长的噪声性前庭电刺激是否能改善前庭病患者的身体平衡。
该试验在日本制药信息中心临床试验信息注册库(jRCT1080224083)中注册。受试者为20至85岁、步态不稳超过一年且尽管经过六个多月康复治疗症状仍持续的患者。入选的受试者被随机分为两组;一组先接受最佳强度的噪声性前庭电刺激,14天后接受安慰剂,另一组则按相反顺序进行评估。主要结局是噪声性前庭电刺激期和安慰剂期在3小时刺激期间压力中心速度相对于基线的平均变化百分比的差异。采用混合效应模型进行分析。
共纳入42名受试者。噪声性前庭电刺激3小时刺激期间速度的平均变化百分比为-9.3%(标准差19.9%),安慰剂组为-12.6%(标准差15.0%)。在差异的最小二乘均值中,未发现噪声性前庭电刺激对安慰剂在速度方面有显著影响[3.1%(95%置信区间-0.2至6.4,p = 0.066)]。
延长的噪声性前庭电刺激对代偿不良的前庭病患者的身体平衡没有显著改善作用。