• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一项针对乳腺癌术后神经性疼痛的随机试验中评估辣椒素179毫克贴剂与普瑞巴林的治疗偏好及疗效:CAPTRANE研究。

Evaluating Treatment Preferences and the Efficacy of Capsaicin 179 mg Patch vs. Pregabalin in a Randomized Trial for Postsurgical Neuropathic Pain in Breast Cancer: CAPTRANE.

作者信息

Dupoiron Denis, Bienfait Florent, Seegers Valérie, Piloquet François-Xavier, Pluchon Yves-Marie, Pechard Marie, Mezaib Karima, Chvetzoff Gisèle, Diaz Jésus, Ahmeidi Abesse, Mauriès-Saffon Valérie, Lebrec Nathalie, Jubier-Hamon Sabrina

机构信息

Anaesthesiology and Pain Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, 49055 Angers, France.

Biometrics Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, 49055 Angers, France.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 19;17(2):313. doi: 10.3390/cancers17020313.

DOI:10.3390/cancers17020313
PMID:39858095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11763653/
Abstract

CAPTRANE evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of high-concentration capsaicin patch (HCCP) vs. oral pregabalin for the treatment of postsurgical neuropathic pain (PSNP) following breast cancer surgery. The study was designed with the aim of demonstrating noninferiority of one HCCP against daily pregabalin. This was a multicenter, randomized, parallel-arm, open-label study conducted across nine centers in France. The primary endpoint was a change from baseline in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score after 2 months. Recruitment challenges resulted in the randomization of 140 patients (versus 644 planned); the per-protocol population comprised 107 patients (HCCP: n = 65; pregabalin: n = 42). Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. In the per-protocol analysis, the mean (standard deviation) change versus baseline in NPRS score was -1.926 (2.554) with HCCP and -1.634 (2.498) with pregabalin. The prespecified analysis showed that HCCP was not inferior to pregabalin: the lower bound of the 90% confidence interval for the between-arm difference was -0.889 and the upper bound was +0.260 (i.e., below the predefined clinical threshold of +0.4). Patient-reported outcomes showed no statistically significant differences between treatments. The painful area size decreased significantly more with HCCP. Tolerability profiles differed, with HCCP mostly causing application-site reactions. While >50% of patients switched from pregabalin to HCCP, none switched from HCCP to pregabalin. This comparative study in PSNP post breast cancer surgery, evaluating a single treatment of HCCP, shows a noninferior reduction in pain intensity, a superior reduction in painful area size, and a patient preference for HCCP compared with pregabalin. Despite limitations, it contributes valuable initial data for PSNP management in breast cancer care.

摘要

CAPTRANE研究评估了高浓度辣椒素贴片(HCCP)与口服普瑞巴林治疗乳腺癌手术后手术部位神经性疼痛(PSNP)的疗效和耐受性。该研究旨在证明一种HCCP相对于每日服用普瑞巴林的非劣效性。这是一项在法国九个中心进行的多中心、随机、平行组、开放标签研究。主要终点是2个月后数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)得分相对于基线的变化。招募方面的困难导致140名患者被随机分组(而计划为644名);符合方案人群包括107名患者(HCCP组:n = 65;普瑞巴林组:n = 42)。两组的基线特征相似。在符合方案分析中,HCCP组NPRS得分相对于基线的平均(标准差)变化为-1.926(2.554),普瑞巴林组为-1.634(2.498)。预先设定的分析表明,HCCP不劣于普瑞巴林:组间差异的90%置信区间下限为-0.889,上限为+0.260(即低于预先定义的临床阈值+0.4)。患者报告的结果显示,各治疗组之间无统计学显著差异。HCCP使疼痛区域大小的减小更为显著。耐受性特征有所不同,HCCP主要引起用药部位反应。虽然超过50%的患者从普瑞巴林改用HCCP,但无人从HCCP改用普瑞巴林。这项针对乳腺癌手术后PSNP的比较研究,评估了单一的HCCP治疗,结果显示与普瑞巴林相比,HCCP在减轻疼痛强度方面具有非劣效性,在减小疼痛区域大小方面效果更优,且患者更倾向于使用HCCP。尽管存在局限性,但它为乳腺癌护理中PSNP的管理提供了有价值的初始数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d14/11763653/2875fb41d2c0/cancers-17-00313-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d14/11763653/f05e12f11b34/cancers-17-00313-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d14/11763653/39147cf65c4a/cancers-17-00313-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d14/11763653/bcd8c0db07ba/cancers-17-00313-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d14/11763653/2875fb41d2c0/cancers-17-00313-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d14/11763653/f05e12f11b34/cancers-17-00313-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d14/11763653/39147cf65c4a/cancers-17-00313-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d14/11763653/bcd8c0db07ba/cancers-17-00313-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d14/11763653/2875fb41d2c0/cancers-17-00313-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating Treatment Preferences and the Efficacy of Capsaicin 179 mg Patch vs. Pregabalin in a Randomized Trial for Postsurgical Neuropathic Pain in Breast Cancer: CAPTRANE.在一项针对乳腺癌术后神经性疼痛的随机试验中评估辣椒素179毫克贴剂与普瑞巴林的治疗偏好及疗效:CAPTRANE研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 19;17(2):313. doi: 10.3390/cancers17020313.
2
Treatment Impact on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: Comparing Single Intervention With Topical High-Concentration Capsaicin to Daily Oral Pregabalin.治疗对外周神经性疼痛患者报告结局的影响:比较单一干预措施(高浓度局部辣椒素贴剂)与每日口服普瑞巴林。
Pain Physician. 2021 Sep;24(6):453-463.
3
Topical treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) with high-concentration (179 mg) capsaicin patch in breast cancer patients - results of the QUCIP study.高浓度(179毫克)辣椒素贴片局部治疗乳腺癌患者化疗引起的周围神经病变(CIPN)——QUCIP研究结果
Front Oncol. 2024 Sep 6;14:1452099. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1452099. eCollection 2024.
4
Optimal pharmacotherapy pathway in adults with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain: the OPTION-DM RCT.成人糖尿病周围神经性疼痛的最佳药物治疗路径:OPTION-DM RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Oct;26(39):1-100. doi: 10.3310/RXUO6757.
5
Capsaicin 8% patch versus oral pregabalin in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain.8%辣椒素贴剂与口服普瑞巴林治疗周围神经性疼痛患者的疗效比较
Eur J Pain. 2016 Feb;20(2):316-28. doi: 10.1002/ejp.731. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
6
Characteristics and outcomes of peripheral neuropathic pain patients with repeated applications of high-concentration capsaicin cutaneous patch: Results of a retrospective chart review in Germany.重复应用高浓度辣椒素贴片的周围神经病理性疼痛患者的特征和结局:德国回顾性图表审查结果。
Pain Pract. 2024 Jun;24(5):700-708. doi: 10.1111/papr.13345. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
7
Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Following Breast Cancer: Effectiveness and Tolerability of High-Concentration Capsaicin Patch.乳腺癌后周围神经性疼痛:高浓度辣椒素贴片的有效性和耐受性
J Pain Res. 2022 Feb 1;15:241-255. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S341378. eCollection 2022.
8
Duloxetine in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain in Japan: a randomized, doubleblind, noninferiority comparative study with pregabalin.度洛西汀用于日本糖尿病性周围神经病理性疼痛患者:一项与普瑞巴林的随机、双盲、非劣效性对照研究。
J Pain Res. 2018 Sep 13;11:1857-1868. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S170646. eCollection 2018.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Efficacy and tolerability of pregabalin using a flexible, optimized dose schedule in Korean patients with peripheral neuropathic pain: a 10-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study.普瑞巴林灵活优化剂量方案治疗韩国外周神经性疼痛患者的疗效和耐受性:一项为期 10 周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心研究。
Clin Ther. 2010 Dec;32(14):2370-85. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.01.014.

引用本文的文献

1
Progressive Response of Repeated Treatment with High-Concentration (179 mg) Capsaicin Patch in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain After Surgical or Traumatic Nerve Injury: Findings from the 12-Month German CASPAR Registry Study.高浓度(179毫克)辣椒素贴剂重复治疗对手术或创伤性神经损伤后周围神经病理性疼痛的渐进性反应:来自为期12个月的德国CASPAR注册研究的结果
Pain Ther. 2025 Jun 15. doi: 10.1007/s40122-025-00752-4.
2
Modulation of Wnt/Beta-Catenin Pathway by Major Dietary Phytochemicals Against Breast Cancer Development.主要膳食植物化学物质对Wnt/β-连环蛋白通路的调节作用与乳腺癌发展的关系
Biology (Basel). 2025 Feb 13;14(2):194. doi: 10.3390/biology14020194.

本文引用的文献

1
Pregabalin vs. gabapentin in the treatment of neuropathic pain: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety.普瑞巴林与加巴喷丁治疗神经性疼痛的疗效及安全性:一项全面的系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 7;5:1513597. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1513597. eCollection 2024.
2
A Review on the Management of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Following Breast Cancer.乳腺癌后周围神经性疼痛的管理综述
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2023 Oct 30;15:761-772. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S386803. eCollection 2023.
3
Quantifying the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical trial screening rates over time in 37 countries.
定量分析 COVID-19 大流行对 37 个国家临床试验筛选率随时间变化的影响。
Trials. 2023 Apr 4;24(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07277-1.
4
Content validity of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30 for use in cancer.癌症患者 EORTC 生活质量问卷核心 30 量表的内容效度。
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Jan;178:128-138. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.10.026. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
5
The European cancer burden in 2020: Incidence and mortality estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers.2020 年欧洲癌症负担:40 个国家和 25 种主要癌症的发病率和死亡率估计。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Nov;157:308-347. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.07.039. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
6
Treatment Impact on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: Comparing Single Intervention With Topical High-Concentration Capsaicin to Daily Oral Pregabalin.治疗对外周神经性疼痛患者报告结局的影响:比较单一干预措施(高浓度局部辣椒素贴剂)与每日口服普瑞巴林。
Pain Physician. 2021 Sep;24(6):453-463.
7
Post-Breast Surgery Pain Syndrome: Shifting a Surgical Paradigm.乳房手术后疼痛综合征:转变手术模式。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Jul 22;9(7):e3720. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003720. eCollection 2021 Jul.
8
Establishment of an Individualized Chronotherapy, Autonomic Nervous System, and Variability-Based Dynamic Platform for Overcoming the Loss of Response to Analgesics.建立个体化时辰治疗、自主神经系统和基于变异性的动态平台,克服对镇痛药反应丧失。
Pain Physician. 2021 May;24(3):243-252.
9
Oral or Topical Pain Therapy-How Would Patients Decide? A Discrete Choice Experiment in Patients with Peripheral Neuropathic Pain.口服或局部止痛治疗——患者如何选择?一项外周神经性疼痛患者的离散选择实验。
Pain Pract. 2021 Jun;21(5):536-546. doi: 10.1111/papr.12989. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
10
Interpretation of chronic pain clinical trial outcomes: IMMPACT recommended considerations.慢性疼痛临床试验结果的解读:IMMPACT推荐的考量因素
Pain. 2020 Nov;161(11):2446-2461. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001952.