Suppr超能文献

两颗相邻种植体支持的冠与一颗种植体支持的悬臂固定义齿的对比研究:一项研究。

Comparative Study between Two Adjacent Implants Supported Crowns and One Implant Supported Cantilever Fixed Dental Prosthesis: An Study.

作者信息

Hussain Mohamed R, Shrif Mohamed M, Othman Hesham I, Mohamed Hussain R

机构信息

Department of Crown and Bridge, Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt, Phone: +20 1000169450, e-mail:

Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2024 Oct 1;25(10):983-991. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3771.

Abstract

AIM

To assess hard as well as soft peri-implant tissues within cases having two lost adjacent anterior teeth treated through placing either two implants with two separate crowns or only an implant along with a crown with a cantilever, and evaluating the effect of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) restoration on cantilever design up to 18 months after functional loading.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven participants (15 males and 12 females; mean age, 38.6 years; range 20-50 years) with missing two adjacent anterior teeth were treated with implant system (Flotecno implant system, Italy). In the first group (implant-implant metal ceramic group), we treated nine participants utilizing two adjacent implants with two separate single metal ceramic crowns. In the second group (implant-cantilever metal ceramic group), we treated nine participants by placing single implant with cantilever metal ceramic fixed dental prosthesis (FDP). In the third group (implant-cantilever PEEK group), we treated nine cases utilizing single implant with a cantilever PEEK FDP framework. Clinical and radiographic examinations were recorded. Marginal bone level, implant stability, and prosthetic complications were assessed during an 18-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

Marginal bone loss (MBL) exhibited similar measurements among all groups. The clinical outcomes did not address significant variance among all groups as regards implant stability within the period of follow-up. We also observed minor prosthetic complications. Participants were very satisfied within all groups.

CONCLUSION

Based on the limitations of our research, utilizing cantilever extensions has no influence on MBL as well as implant stability.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Mean marginal bone level exhibited a significant rise from baseline to 18 months for all groups, however, still within the clinically accepted range. Regarding implant stability, no significant variance was observed among all groups for 18 months. The cantilever FDP design facilitated prosthesis fabrication among those having laterals of narrow diameters. Further research is required to investigate such a particular concern due to a limited sample size in our research. How to cite this article: Hussain MR, Shrif MM, Othman HI, Comparative Study between Two Adjacent Implants Supported Crowns and One Implant Supported Cantilever Fixed Dental Prosthesis: An Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(10):983-991.

摘要

目的

评估在两种相邻前牙缺失的病例中,通过植入两颗种植体并分别制作两个牙冠,或仅植入一颗种植体并制作带有悬臂的牙冠来治疗时,种植体周围的硬组织和软组织情况,并评估聚醚醚酮(PEEK)修复体对悬臂设计在功能加载后长达18个月的影响。

材料与方法

27名相邻两颗前牙缺失的参与者(15名男性和12名女性;平均年龄38.6岁;年龄范围20 - 50岁)接受了种植系统(意大利Flotecno种植系统)治疗。第一组(种植体 - 种植体金属陶瓷组),我们对9名参与者使用两颗相邻种植体并分别制作两个单金属陶瓷牙冠进行治疗。第二组(种植体 - 悬臂金属陶瓷组),我们对9名参与者通过植入单颗种植体并制作悬臂金属陶瓷固定义齿(FDP)进行治疗。第三组(种植体 - 悬臂PEEK组),我们对9例患者使用单颗种植体并制作悬臂PEEK FDP框架进行治疗。记录临床和影像学检查结果。在18个月的随访期内评估边缘骨水平、种植体稳定性和修复并发症。

结果

所有组的边缘骨丢失(MBL)测量值相似。临床结果显示,在随访期间,所有组在种植体稳定性方面没有显著差异。我们还观察到轻微的修复并发症。所有组的参与者都非常满意。

结论

基于我们研究的局限性,使用悬臂延伸对MBL和种植体稳定性没有影响。

临床意义

所有组从基线到18个月时平均边缘骨水平均有显著升高,但仍在临床可接受范围内。关于种植体稳定性,18个月内所有组之间未观察到显著差异。悬臂FDP设计便于在那些侧牙直径较窄的患者中制作修复体。由于我们研究中的样本量有限,需要进一步研究来调查这一特殊问题。如何引用本文:侯赛因MR,什里夫MM,奥斯曼HI,《两颗相邻种植体支持牙冠与一颗种植体支持悬臂固定义齿的比较研究》。《当代牙科实践杂志》2024;25(10):983 - 991。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验