Tricuspid regurgitation and outcomes in mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The association between periprocedural change in tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and outcomes in patients undergoing mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is unclear. This study aimed to examine the prognostic value of TR before and after M-TEER.

METHODS

Patients in the OCEAN-Mitral registry were divided into four groups according to baseline and post-procedure echocardiographic assessments: no TR/no TR (no TR), no TR/significant TR (new-onset TR), significant TR/no TR (normalized TR), and significant TR/significant TR (residual TR) (all represents before/after M-TEER). Tricuspid regurgitation ≥ moderate was defined as significant. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization. Tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The numbers of patients in each group were 2103 (no TR), 201 (new-onset TR), 504 (normalized TR), and 858 (residual TR). Baseline assessment for TR and TR pressure gradient was not associated with outcomes after M-TEER. In contrast, patients with new-onset TR had the highest adjusted risk for the primary outcome, followed by those with residual TR [compared with no TR as a reference, hazard ratio 1.83 (95% confidence interval: 1.39-2.40) for new-onset TR, 1.45 (1.23-1.72) for residual TR, and 0.82 (0.65-1.04) for normalized TR]. Similarly, from baseline to post-procedure, TR pressure gradient changes were associated with subsequent outcomes after M-TEER. New-onset and residual TR incidence was commonly associated with dilated tricuspid annulus diameter and atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-procedural TR, but not baseline TR, was associated with outcomes after M-TEER. Careful TR assessment after the procedure would provide an optimal management for concomitant significant TR in patients undergoing M-TEER.