Kuo Lu Yu, Lim Zhong Li Titus, Letch Caitlin, Silverman Joshua, Kim Jason Jae Yeun, McClintock Scott
Department of Urology Gold Coast University Hostpial Southport Queensland Australia.
Department of Urology Princess Alexandra Hospital Woolloongabba Queensland Australia.
BJUI Compass. 2025 Jan 13;6(1):e480. doi: 10.1002/bco2.480. eCollection 2025 Jan.
To evaluate the utility of the HAS-BLED bleeding risk-estimation tool to predict for clinically significant postoperative haematuria in patients receiving transurethral resection of prostate (TURP).
A single-centre, retrospective cohort analysis of patients underwent TURP from April 2019 to December 2023 for treatment of symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia. The primary objective was to evaluate reliability of HAS-BLED score in predicting postoperative bleeding event. A focus sub-analysis was performed on anticoagulated patient cohort. Each patient was categorised in to HASBLED low-, moderate- and high-risk group according to the preestablished estimator tool. Patients' demographics, clinical, pathological and operative details were collected. Events of clinically significant haematuria within 3 months postoperatively were captured. Cohort characteristics and outcome were analysed with two-sided test and ANOVA test. Further weight-adjusted multivariable analysis and ROC curve was performed to evaluate the predictive value of HAS-BLED score.
Our analysis showed that patients assigned as high-risk by HAS-BLED were at 2.17-times higher chance of developing clinically significant haematuria compared to the low-risk patients. The risk for high-risk patient was 18.5% (95%CI 11.7-25.3%) and 8.5% (95%CI 4.6-12.4%) for low-risk patients. Moderate-risk did not demonstrate any significant difference relative to the low-risk group. Sub-analysis of 113 patients receiving long-term anticoagulation accentuates the utility of the tool. The risk of haematuria for high-risk patient was 32.7% (95%CI 20.7-44.7%), moderate-risk patient was 28.7% (95%CI 17.0-40.3%), and low-risk patient was 9.7% (95%CI 4.2-15.2%). In this cohort, the risk of haematuria was 3.37 and 2.96 times higher in the high and moderate-risk compared to the low-risk group, respectively.
This is the first study to validate a bleeding estimator tool for TURP patients. High HAS-BLED score positively predicts clinically significant post-TURP haematuria, particularly for patients receiving anticoagulation therapy.
评估HAS - BLED出血风险评估工具预测经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)患者术后发生具有临床意义血尿的效用。
对2019年4月至2023年12月因症状性良性前列腺增生接受TURP的患者进行单中心回顾性队列分析。主要目的是评估HAS - BLED评分预测术后出血事件的可靠性。对抗凝患者队列进行重点亚组分析。根据既定的评估工具将每位患者分为HAS - BLED低、中、高风险组。收集患者的人口统计学、临床、病理和手术细节。记录术后3个月内具有临床意义的血尿事件。采用双侧检验和方差分析对队列特征和结果进行分析。进一步进行加权调整多变量分析和ROC曲线分析以评估HAS - BLED评分的预测价值。
我们的分析表明,与低风险患者相比,被HAS - BLED判定为高风险的患者发生具有临床意义血尿的几率高2.17倍。高风险患者的风险为18.5%(95%CI 11.7 - 25.3%),低风险患者为8.5%(95%CI 4.6 - 12.4%)。中风险组与低风险组相比未显示出任何显著差异。对113例接受长期抗凝治疗的患者进行的亚组分析突出了该工具的效用。高风险患者血尿风险为32.7%(95%CI 20.7 - 44.7%),中风险患者为28.7%(95%CI 17.0 - 40.3%),低风险患者为9.7%(95%CI 4.2 - 15.2%)。在该队列中,高风险和中风险患者血尿风险分别比低风险组高3.37倍和2.96倍。
这是第一项验证TURP患者出血评估工具的研究。高HAS - BLED评分可积极预测TURP术后具有临床意义的血尿,尤其是对抗凝治疗患者。