Chappell Digby, Yang Zeyu, Clark Angus B, Berkovic Alexandre, Laganier Colin, Baxter Weston, Bello Fernando, Kormushev Petar, Rojas Nicolas
Dyson School of Design Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 29;15(1):3690. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87048-x.
Myoelectric prosthetic hands are typically controlled to move between discrete positions and do not provide sensory feedback to the user. In this work, we present and evaluate a closed-loop, continuous myoelectric prosthetic hand controller, that can continuously control the position of multiple degrees of freedom of a prosthesis while rendering proprioceptive feedback to the user via a haptic feedback armband. Twenty-eight participants without and ten participants with upper limb difference (ULD) were recruited to holistically evaluate the physical and psychological effects of the controller via isolated control and sensory tasks, dexterity assessments, embodiment and task load questionnaires, and post-study interviews. The combination of proprioceptive feedback and continuous control enabled more accurate position and force modulation than without proprioceptive feedback, and restored blindfolded object identification ability to open-loop discrete controller levels. Dexterity assessment and embodiment questionnaire results revealed no significant physical performance or psychological embodiment differences between control types, with the exception of perceived sensation questions, which were significantly higher (p < 0.001) for closed-loop controllers. Key differences between participants with and without ULD were identified, including increasingly lower perceived body completeness and heterogeneity in frustration in participants with ULD, which can inform future development and rehabilitation.
肌电假手通常被控制在离散位置之间移动,并且不会向用户提供感觉反馈。在这项工作中,我们展示并评估了一种闭环、连续的肌电假手控制器,该控制器可以连续控制假肢多个自由度的位置,同时通过触觉反馈臂带向用户提供本体感觉反馈。招募了28名无上肢差异(ULD)的参与者和10名有ULD的参与者,通过单独的控制和感觉任务、灵巧性评估、具身化和任务负荷问卷以及研究后访谈,全面评估该控制器的生理和心理影响。与没有本体感觉反馈相比,本体感觉反馈和连续控制的结合能够实现更精确的位置和力调制,并将蒙眼物体识别能力恢复到开环离散控制器的水平。灵巧性评估和具身化问卷结果显示,除了感觉感知问题外,不同控制类型之间在身体表现或心理具身化方面没有显著差异,对于闭环控制器,感觉感知问题显著更高(p < 0.001)。确定了有ULD和无ULD参与者之间的关键差异,包括有ULD的参与者感觉身体完整性越来越低以及挫折感的异质性,这可为未来的发展和康复提供参考。