Falkai Peter, Wagner Elias, John Miriam, Yakimov Vladislav, Galderisi Silvana, Bitter Istvan, Dom Geert, Schmitt Andrea, Gaebel Wolfgang, Carpiniello Bernardo, Hasan Alkomiet
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
DZPG (German Center for Mental Health), Partner Site München/Augsburg, LMU Munich, Germany.
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 30;68(1):e26. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1794.
The development of guidelines is time-consuming and cost-intensive. The heterogeneity of clinical practice, evidence, and patients' needs is an issue across Europe. An European core guidance for a specific psychiatric disorder may help to overcome this issue. Here, we present a progress report on the European Psychiatric Association (EPA) proof-of-concept approach to develop a European consensus guidance on the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia.
All national psychiatric associations in Europe were contacted to provide their schizophrenia guidelines. Six guidelines were rated by three experts, experienced in the development of national and international guidelines, from three different countries (Italy, Hungary, and Germany), and the German schizophrenia guideline published in 2019 was found to have the highest quality. For this proof-of-concept approach, 45 recommendations on the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia from the German guideline were evaluated in a two-step Delphi process to determine their acceptability throughout the European continent.
44 experts participated in the first round and 40 experts in the second round of the Delphi process. Agreement among the involved experts was reached for 75% of the presented recommendations from the German schizophrenia guidelines. 11 out of 45 recommendations (24.4%) did not reach this level of agreement.
This progress report highlights the possibility of developing a pan-European core guidance on the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia by adapting national guidelines and reconciling their recommendations. However, several barriers in this adaptation process, such as non-agreement in recommendations with strong scientific evidence in the reconciling process, were identified and must be considered when developing the final guidance.
制定指南耗时且成本高昂。临床实践、证据和患者需求的异质性是整个欧洲面临的一个问题。针对特定精神疾病的欧洲核心指南可能有助于克服这一问题。在此,我们展示一份关于欧洲精神病学协会(EPA)概念验证方法的进展报告,该方法旨在制定关于精神分裂症药物治疗的欧洲共识指南。
联系了欧洲所有国家的精神病学协会以获取其精神分裂症指南。来自三个不同国家(意大利、匈牙利和德国)的三位在制定国家和国际指南方面经验丰富的专家对六项指南进行了评分,结果发现2019年发布的德国精神分裂症指南质量最高。对于这种概念验证方法,在两轮德尔菲过程中对德国指南中关于精神分裂症药物治疗的45条建议进行了评估,以确定其在整个欧洲大陆的可接受性。
44名专家参与了德尔菲过程的第一轮,40名专家参与了第二轮。参与的专家对德国精神分裂症指南中提出的75%的建议达成了一致。45条建议中有11条(24.4%)未达到这一一致水平。
本进展报告强调了通过调整国家指南并协调其建议来制定关于精神分裂症药物治疗的泛欧核心指南的可能性。然而,在这一调整过程中发现了一些障碍,例如在协调过程中对于具有强有力科学证据的建议存在分歧,在制定最终指南时必须予以考虑。