Suppr超能文献

硝酸甘油注射对远端桡动脉入路桡动脉结局的影响

Impact of Nitroglycerine Injection on Radial Artery Outcomes in Distal Transradial Access.

作者信息

Karaca Mehmet, Dağdeviren Bahadır

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Private Ataşehir Memorial Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.

出版信息

Anatol J Cardiol. 2025 Jan 31;29(3):139-44. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2025.4877.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preventive measures for radial artery complications in distal transradial approach are not fully studied. Our aim was to investigate the role of nitroglycerine injection in patients undergoing coronary angiography via distal transradial access.

METHODS

In this study, 168 patients who underwent angiographic procedures performed via distal transradial route with or without nitroglycerine injection were evaluated. Demographic, angiographic, and laboratory characteristics were recorded. Radial artery outcomes, including radial artery spasm, radial artery occlusion, and hematoma were compared between these groups and P values < .05 indicated significant differences.

RESULTS

Radial artery outcome occurred in 22% of the study population (n = 37), with radial artery spasm being the most encountered complication (n = 28, 16.7%). The groups were not different in terms of radial artery complications. Procedural features were also comparable except for the total contrast volume used.

CONCLUSION

Coronary angiographic procedures could be performed safely using distal transradial access without nitroglycerine injection.

摘要

背景

经桡动脉远端途径发生桡动脉并发症的预防措施尚未得到充分研究。我们的目的是探讨硝酸甘油注射在经桡动脉远端途径行冠状动脉造影患者中的作用。

方法

在本研究中,对168例经桡动脉远端途径行血管造影术的患者进行了评估,这些患者接受了或未接受硝酸甘油注射。记录人口统计学、血管造影和实验室特征。比较两组之间的桡动脉结局,包括桡动脉痉挛、桡动脉闭塞和血肿,P值<0.05表示有显著差异。

结果

22%的研究人群(n = 37)出现桡动脉结局,其中桡动脉痉挛是最常见的并发症(n = 28,16.7%)。两组在桡动脉并发症方面无差异。除使用的造影剂总量外,手术特征也具有可比性。

结论

经桡动脉远端途径行冠状动脉造影术时,不注射硝酸甘油也可安全进行。

相似文献

1
Impact of Nitroglycerine Injection on Radial Artery Outcomes in Distal Transradial Access.
Anatol J Cardiol. 2025 Jan 31;29(3):139-44. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2025.4877.
2
Distal snuffbox versus conventional radial artery access: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Vasc Access. 2022 Jul;23(4):653-659. doi: 10.1177/11297298211005256. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Distal Radial Artery Approach for Coronary Angiography: A Retrospective Study.
Heart Surg Forum. 2023 Oct 25;26(5):E577-E583. doi: 10.59958/hsf.5887.
4
The effect of topical medications on radial artery spasm in patients undergoing transradial coronary procedures: a systematic review.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018 Mar;16(3):738-751. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003358.
6
The effect of vasodilatory medications on radial artery spasm in patients undergoing transradial coronary artery procedures: a systematic review.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Jul;15(7):1952-1967. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003039.
7
Topical Lidocaine And Or/ Intravenous Midazolam Before Radial Coronary Angiography To Prevent Radial Artery Spasm.
J Pak Med Assoc. 2023 Apr;73(Suppl 4)(4):S103-S108. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.EGY-S4-22.
8
Recanalization of the occluded radial artery via distal transradial access in the anatomic snuffbox.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Feb 2;21(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-01890-1.
9
Transradial Approach for Neuroendovascular Procedures: A Single-Center Review of Safety and Feasibility.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Jan;42(2):313-318. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6971. Epub 2021 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Distal Radial Approach in Coronary Angiography Using a Transdermal Nitroglycerin Patch: Double-Blinded Randomized Trial.
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Sep 15;203:325-331. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.068. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
2
Comparison of spasmolytic regimen for prevention of radial artery spasm during the distal radial approach: A single-center, randomized study.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 1;10:1007147. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1007147. eCollection 2023.
3
Distal Transradial Access in Anatomical Snuffbox for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Jul 22;2021:7099044. doi: 10.1155/2021/7099044. eCollection 2021.
4
Distal radial approach: a review on achieving a high success rate.
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021 Jan;36(1):30-38. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00729-4. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
5
Distal transradial access: a review of the feasibility and safety in cardiovascular angiography and intervention.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Aug 5;20(1):356. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01625-8.
6
Radial artery spasm: reviews and updates.
Ir J Med Sci. 2020 Nov;189(4):1253-1258. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02203-9. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
7
Feasibility of primary percutaneous coronary intervention via the distal radial approach in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Korean J Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(Suppl 1):S53-S61. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2019.420. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
8
Update on complications and their management during transradial cardiac catheterization.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2019 Oct;17(10):741-751. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2019.1675510.
9
The Left Distal Transradial Artery Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: A US Experience.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Sep;20(9):786-789. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.10.023. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
10
Gender differences in the distal radial artery diameter for the snuffbox approach.
Cardiol J. 2018;25(5):639-641. doi: 10.5603/CJ.2018.0128.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验