Yoo Ji-Min, Kim Ju-Wan, Kim Seon-Young, Ryu Seunghyong, Lee Ju-Yeon, Jung Sook-In, Kim Jae-Min, Kim Sung-Wan
Department of Psychiatry, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Psychiatry Investig. 2025 Jan;22(1):110-116. doi: 10.30773/pi.2024.0264. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
Stigma influences perceptions of mental illness and novel diseases like coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), often impeding healthcare access despite advancements in medical treatment. This study compares the stigma associated with COVID-19 and mental illness to identify factors that could help reduce stigma.
An online survey was conducted in May 2023 among 1,500 participants aged 19 to 65 in South Korea, using a panel from Embrain, an online survey service. The survey assessed stigma and distress related to COVID-19 and mental illness using a validated questionnaire. It collected demographic and clinical data, evaluated COVID-19-related stigma, fear, and knowledge, and measured prejudice and attitudes toward psychiatric treatment. Personality traits were assessed using the Big Five Inventory (BFI)-10. Factors significantly associated with stigma scores were entered into linear regression analysis.
COVID-19-related stigma scores were significantly negatively correlated with knowledge of COVID-19 and positively correlated with fear of infection and age. Individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection had significantly lower scores on COVID-19-related stigma. Similarly, mental illness stigma was negatively correlated with knowledge of psychiatric treatment and positively correlated with age, as well as conscientiousness and neuroticism in the BFI. Personal experience with individuals with mental illness was associated with significantly lower stigma scores.
This study suggests that the mechanism-making stigma was similar in cases of traditional mental illness and a novel infectious disease. Both cognitive and experiential factors influence stigma. Educating the public about the disease and enabling interactions with affected individuals emerge as effective strategies for stigma reduction.
污名化影响对精神疾病和新型疾病(如2019冠状病毒病,即COVID-19)的认知,尽管医疗治疗有所进步,但往往阻碍医疗服务的获取。本研究比较与COVID-19和精神疾病相关的污名,以确定有助于减少污名的因素。
2023年5月,在韩国对1500名年龄在19至65岁之间的参与者进行了一项在线调查,使用在线调查服务Embrain的一个小组。该调查使用经过验证的问卷评估与COVID-19和精神疾病相关的污名和痛苦。它收集了人口统计学和临床数据,评估了与COVID-19相关的污名、恐惧和知识,并测量了对精神治疗的偏见和态度。使用大五人格量表(BFI)-10评估人格特质。将与污名得分显著相关的因素纳入线性回归分析。
与COVID-19相关的污名得分与对COVID-19的了解显著负相关,与感染恐惧和年龄显著正相关。有COVID-19感染史的个体在与COVID-19相关的污名方面得分显著较低。同样,精神疾病污名与对精神治疗知识的了解负相关,与年龄以及BFI中的尽责性和神经质正相关。与患有精神疾病的个体的个人经历与显著较低的污名得分相关。
本研究表明,在传统精神疾病和新型传染病的情况下,产生污名的机制相似。认知和体验因素都影响污名。对公众进行疾病教育并促进与受影响个体的互动是减少污名的有效策略。