Wang Jie, Yu Jia
Department of Geriatric Internal Medicine, Huzhou Third Municipal Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Huzhou Third Municipal Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 31;20(1):e0318437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318437. eCollection 2025.
There is still a significant gap in understanding the impact of concomitant or previous cancer diagnoses on clinical outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
To provide updated evidence on the effect of concomitant or previous cancer diagnoses on mortality and risk of complications, specifically major bleeding, myocardial reinfarction, and stroke, of patients with AMI.
A literature search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases. English-language cohort studies published in peer-reviewed journals were included. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using random-effects models and reported as odds ratio (OR) or hazards ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the standard GRADE approach.
A total of 22 studies were included. AMI patients with previous or concurrent cancer had increased risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.20, 1.73), in-hospital mortality related to cardiovascular complications (OR 2.06, 95% CI: 1.17, 3.65), mortality at 30-days follow up (OR 1.47, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.74) and mortality at 1 year follow up (HR 2.67, 95% CI: 1.73, 4.11), compared to patients without cancer. The risk of major bleeding (OR 1.74, 95% CI: 1.40, 2.16), reinfarction (OR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.37), and stroke (OR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.37) was also higher in patients with previous or concurrent cancer. The certainty of evidence was rated as "low" for all outcomes, except for the risk of major bleeding, which was rated as "very low."
Based on the low to very low certainty of evidence, we conclude that the presence of previous cancer diagnosis or concurrent cancer may increase the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with AMI. Early interventions, such as close monitoring of cardiac function, lifestyle modifications, and targeted pharmacological therapies, might help mitigate the risk of AMI and improve overall clinical outcomes. However, further methodologically rigorous studies are needed to validate the findings of this review.
在理解合并或既往癌症诊断对急性心肌梗死(AMI)临床结局的影响方面,仍存在显著差距。
提供关于合并或既往癌症诊断对AMI患者死亡率及并发症风险(特别是大出血、心肌再梗死和中风)影响的最新证据。
在PubMed、EMBASE和Scopus数据库中进行文献检索。纳入在同行评审期刊上发表的英文队列研究。使用随机效应模型计算合并效应估计值,并以比值比(OR)或风险比(HR)及95%置信区间(CI)报告。采用标准的GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。
共纳入22项研究。与无癌症患者相比,既往或合并癌症的AMI患者住院死亡率(OR 1.44,95% CI:1.20,1.73)、与心血管并发症相关的住院死亡率(OR 2.06,95% CI:1.17,3.65)、30天随访死亡率(OR 1.47,95% CI:1.24,1.74)及1年随访死亡率(HR 2.67,95% CI:1.73,4.11)均升高。既往或合并癌症的患者大出血风险(OR 1.74,95% CI:1.40,2.16)、再梗死风险(OR 1.20,95% CI:1.05,1.37)及中风风险(OR 1.16,95% CI:0.99,1.37)也更高。除大出血风险被评为“极低”外,所有结局的证据确定性均被评为“低”。
基于低至极低的证据确定性,我们得出结论,既往癌症诊断或合并癌症可能增加AMI患者不良结局的风险。早期干预,如密切监测心功能、改变生活方式和针对性的药物治疗,可能有助于降低AMI风险并改善总体临床结局。然而,需要进一步进行方法学严谨的研究来验证本综述的结果。