Karavirta Laura, Aittokoski Timo, Pynnönen Katja, Rantalainen Timo, Westgate Kate, Gonzales Tomas, Palmberg Lotta, Neuvonen Joona, Lipponen Jukka A, Turunen Katri, Nikander Riku, Portegijs Erja, Rantanen Taina, Brage Søren
Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences and Gerontology Research Center, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 3;20(2):e0314456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314456. eCollection 2025.
The ability to perform bodily movement varies in ageing men and women. We investigated whether physical fitness may explain sex differences in daily physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) among older people.
In this cross-sectional study, a population-based cohort of 75, 80, and 85-year-old men and women (n = 409, 62% women) underwent laboratory-based assessment of walking speed, maximal knee extension strength, and body fat percentage. Free-living physical activity was assessed as total PAEE, and light (LPA) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) using individually calibrated combined accelerometry and heart rate sensing. Path modelling was used to examine indirect associations between sex, physical fitness, and physical activity.
Men had better physical fitness and higher overall PAEE (mean 34.0 (SD 10.8) kJ/kg/day) than women (28.3 (8.4) kJ/kg/day, p<0.001). The path model for PAEE explained 33% of the variance. The direct association between sex and PAEE was non-significant, whereas the association between sex and PAEE mediated by body fat (β = 0.20, p<0.001) and walking speed (β = 0.05, p = 0.001) were statistically significant. Similarly, associations between sex and MVPA mediated by body fat (β = 0.11, p = 0.002) and walking speed (β = 0.05, p = 0.001) were significant, as were the associations between sex and LPA mediated by body fat (β = 0.24, p<0.001) and walking speed (β = 0.03, p = 0.019).
Differences in physical activity between men and women may reflect underlying differences in cardiorespiratory fitness and adiposity. These results highlight the importance of maintaining physical fitness to support active living in older adults.
老年男性和女性的身体运动能力存在差异。我们调查了身体素质是否可以解释老年人日常身体活动能量消耗(PAEE)中的性别差异。
在这项横断面研究中,对一组以社区为基础的75岁、80岁和85岁的男性和女性(n = 409,62%为女性)进行了基于实验室的步行速度、最大膝关节伸展力量和体脂百分比评估。使用单独校准的加速度计和心率感应设备,将自由生活状态下的身体活动评估为总PAEE、轻度(LPA)和中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)。采用路径模型来检验性别、身体素质和身体活动之间的间接关联。
男性的身体素质更好,总体PAEE(平均34.0(标准差10.8)kJ/kg/天)高于女性(28.3(8.4)kJ/kg/天,p<0.001)。PAEE的路径模型解释了33%的方差。性别与PAEE之间的直接关联不显著,而由体脂(β = 0.20,p<0.001)和步行速度(β = 0.05,p = 0.001)介导的性别与PAEE之间的关联具有统计学意义。同样,由体脂(β = 0.11,p = 0.002)和步行速度(β = 0.05,p = 0.001)介导的性别与MVPA之间的关联显著,由体脂(β = 0.24,p<0.001)和步行速度(β = 0.03,p = 0.019)介导的性别与LPA之间的关联也显著。
男性和女性在身体活动方面的差异可能反映了心肺功能和肥胖程度的潜在差异。这些结果凸显了保持身体素质以支持老年人积极生活的重要性。