Suppr超能文献

使用聚类分析识别显微镜下多血管炎患者的新型临床亚型:多中心REVEAL队列研究

Identification of novel clinical subtypes in patients with microscopic polyangiitis using cluster analysis: multicenter REVEAL cohort study.

作者信息

Okazaki Ayana, Matsuda Shogo, Kotani Takuya, Fukui Keisuke, Gon Takaho, Watanabe Ryu, Manabe Atsushi, Shoji Mikihito, Kadoba Keiichiro, Hiwa Ryosuke, Yamamoto Wataru, Hashimoto Motomu, Takeuchi Tohru

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine IV, Division of Rheumatology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.

Faculty of Societal Safety Sciences, Kansai University, Takatsuki, Japan.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2025 Jan 20;15:1450153. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1450153. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to identify new clinical phenotypes of microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) using a principal components analysis (PCA)-based cluster analysis.

METHODS

A total of 189 patients with MPA between May 2005 and December 2021 were enrolled from a multicenter cohort in Japan (REVEAL cohort). Categorical PCA and cluster analysis were performed based on clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings. Clinical characteristics and outcomes, including all-cause mortality, respiratory-related mortality, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and relapse were compared between each cluster.

RESULTS

Eleven clinical variables were transformed into four components using categorical PCA and synthetic variables were created. Additionally, a cluster analysis was performed using these variables to classify patients with MPA into subgroups. Four distinct clinical subgroups were identified: Cluster 1 included the renal involvements and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH)-dominant group (N=33). Cluster 2 comprised the elderly onset systemic inflammation group (N=75). Cluster 3 included patients in the younger-onset limited-organ disease group (N=45). Cluster 4 was comprised of an ILD-predominant group without kidney involvement (N=36). 61 patients died during follow-up, with 32 dying of respiratory-related causes. Additionally, 19 patients developed ESRD and 70 relapsed. Cluster 1 showed the worst ESRD-free survival and relapse rates, whereas Cluster 2 showed the worst overall survival and respiratory-related death-free survival rates among the four groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identified four unique subgroups with different MPA outcomes. Individualized treatments for each subgroup may be required to improve the prognosis of MPA.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在使用基于主成分分析(PCA)的聚类分析来识别显微镜下多血管炎(MPA)的新临床表型。

方法

2005年5月至2021年12月期间,从日本的一个多中心队列(REVEAL队列)中纳入了189例MPA患者。基于临床、实验室和影像学检查结果进行分类主成分分析和聚类分析。比较各聚类之间的临床特征和结局,包括全因死亡率、呼吸相关死亡率、终末期肾病(ESRD)和复发情况。

结果

使用分类主成分分析将11个临床变量转化为4个成分,并创建了综合变量。此外,使用这些变量进行聚类分析,将MPA患者分为亚组。识别出四个不同的临床亚组:聚类1包括以肾脏受累和弥漫性肺泡出血(DAH)为主的组(N = 33)。聚类2由老年起病的全身炎症组(N = 75)组成。聚类3包括年轻起病的局限性器官疾病组患者(N = 45)。聚类4由无肾脏受累的以间质性肺病(ILD)为主的组(N = 36)组成。61例患者在随访期间死亡,其中32例死于呼吸相关原因。此外,19例患者发生了ESRD,70例复发。聚类1显示出最差的无ESRD生存率和复发率,而聚类2在四组中显示出最差的总生存率和无呼吸相关死亡生存率。

结论

我们的研究识别出四个具有不同MPA结局的独特亚组。可能需要对每个亚组进行个体化治疗以改善MPA的预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68a/11788177/3fd9fdd8d4c0/fimmu-15-1450153-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验