Suppr超能文献

成人单孔与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Kossenas Konstantinos, Kouzeiha Riad, Moutzouri Olga, Georgopoulos Filippos

机构信息

Department of Basic and Clinical Sciences, University of Nicosia Medical School, 21 Ilia Papakyriakou, 2414 Engomi, P.O. Box 24005, 1700, Nicosia, Cyprus.

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2025 Apr;77(2):287-296. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02112-5. Epub 2025 Feb 4.

Abstract

Three-port (trocar) laparoscopic appendectomy is the standard treatment for acute appendicitis and previous studies have compared to single-incision approach, however, they often include both pediatric and adult patients and fail to account for surgeons' experience, leading to variability in outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to address these literature gaps by focusing on adult patients and controlling for surgeon expertise. We conducted a comprehensive search of randomized controlled trials comparing single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) up to November 2024. We assessed the length of hospitalization, operative duration, postoperative complications, and surgical wound infections. Data were synthesized using random-effects models to account for variability among studies. The meta-analysis included four studies with a total of 408 patients, comprising 202 in the single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) group and 206 in the conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) group. For the length of hospitalization, no statistically significant difference was observed, with a weighted mean difference (WMD) of 0.07 days (95% CI  - 0.32 to 0.47, I = 0%, p = 0.72). Similarly, the operative duration showed no significant difference, with a WMD of 4.49 min (95% CI  - 7.02 to 16.00, I = 89%, p = 0.44). The analysis of postoperative complications also revealed no significant difference between the groups, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.32 (95% CI 0.69 to 2.51, I = 0%, p = 0.40). Surgical wound infections were found to be comparable, with an OR of 1.14 (95% CI 0.46 to 2.83, I = 0%, p = 0.78). Sensitivity analysis indicated that the results were statistically significant regarding operative duration when Kim et al. was excluded from the analysis. SILA and CLA yield comparable outcomes in terms of hospitalization length, operative duration, and complications, suggesting that both techniques are viable options for the management of acute appendicitis in adults. Further studies investigating overall cosmesis, patient satisfaction, and postoperative pain are warranted to optimize surgical approaches.PROSPERO registration: CRD42024612596.

摘要

三孔(套管针)腹腔镜阑尾切除术是急性阑尾炎的标准治疗方法,以往的研究将其与单切口手术方法进行了比较,然而,这些研究通常同时纳入了儿童和成人患者,且未考虑外科医生的经验,导致结果存在差异。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在通过聚焦于成年患者并控制外科医生的专业水平来填补这些文献空白。我们对截至2024年11月比较单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术(SILA)和传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术(CLA)的随机对照试验进行了全面检索。我们评估了住院时间、手术时长、术后并发症和手术切口感染情况。使用随机效应模型对数据进行综合分析,以考虑研究之间的差异。荟萃分析纳入了4项研究,共408例患者,其中单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术(SILA)组202例,传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术(CLA)组206例。在住院时间方面,未观察到统计学上的显著差异,加权平均差(WMD)为0.07天(95%CI -0.32至0.47,I=0%,p=0.72)。同样,手术时长也无显著差异,WMD为4.49分钟(95%CI -7.02至16.00,I=89%,p=0.44)。术后并发症分析也显示两组之间无显著差异,比值比(OR)为1.32(95%CI 0.69至2.51,I=0%,p=0.40)。发现手术切口感染情况相当,OR为1.14(95%CI 0.46至2.83,I=0%,p=0.78)。敏感性分析表明,在排除Kim等人的研究后,手术时长的结果具有统计学意义。SILA和CLA在住院时间、手术时长和并发症方面产生的结果相当,这表明两种技术都是治疗成人急性阑尾炎的可行选择。有必要进行进一步研究,以调查总体美容效果、患者满意度和术后疼痛情况,从而优化手术方法。PROSPERO注册号:CRD42024612596。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验