Hussien Mohammed
Department of Health Systems Management and Health Economics, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 4;25(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12352-1.
Mistrust in community-based health insurance schemes is a significant deterrent to enrollment and renewal decisions. Despite its significance, there is little evidence on the level of community trust in such schemes. This study examined the level of trust in the integrity of a community-based health insurance scheme and its determinants in two rural districts of northeast Ethiopia.
A community-based cross-sectional study was carried out on 1,232 randomly selected rural households who had been registered in a community-based health insurance scheme. The data were collected through face-to-face interviews using an electronic data collection platform. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis was performed using the partial proportional odds model to examine predictors of trust. The degree of association was assessed using odds ratios, and statistical significance was determined at a 95% confidence interval.
The mean score of the five trust dimensions was 5.86 on a scale of 0-10, ranging from 5.06 to 7.65. In the multivariable regression analysis, age (AOR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.10, 2.29), female gender (AOR = 2.05; 95% CI: 1.29, 3.25), education (AOR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.80), insurance membership status (AOR = 2.68; 95% CI: 1.89, 3.80), membership duration (AOR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.19, 1.92), value for solidarity (AOR = 1.71; 95% CI: 1.20, 2.45), perceived risk protection (AOR = 3.35; 95% CI: 2.27, 4.96), and perceived quality of care (AOR = 1.78; 95% CI: 1.34, 2.37) were positive predictors of trust in the integrity of the scheme, while wealth index (AOR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.47), and hospitalization history (AOR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.82) were negative predictors of trust.
Trust in the integrity of the scheme received mediocre scores, with some trust dimensions having lower ratings, indicating specific areas of focus to be considered in trust-building. Scheme administrators and health authorities need to devise strategies to improve people's understanding of the basic principles of health insurance and promote access to high-quality care while minimizing expenditures at the point of receiving care.
对社区医疗保险计划的不信任是参保和续保决策的重大阻碍。尽管其重要性,但关于社区对这类计划的信任程度的证据却很少。本研究调查了埃塞俄比亚东北部两个农村地区对社区医疗保险计划诚信度的信任水平及其决定因素。
对1232户随机选取的已登记参加社区医疗保险计划的农村家庭进行了基于社区的横断面研究。数据通过使用电子数据收集平台的面对面访谈收集。使用部分比例优势模型进行多变量有序逻辑回归分析,以检验信任的预测因素。使用优势比评估关联程度,并在95%置信区间确定统计显著性。
五个信任维度的平均得分在0至10分的量表上为5.86,范围为5.06至7.65。在多变量回归分析中,年龄(调整后优势比[AOR]=1.58;95%置信区间:1.10,2.29)、女性性别(AOR=2.05;95%置信区间:1.29,3.25)、教育程度(AOR=1.36;95%置信区间:1.03,1.80)、保险参保状态(AOR=2.68;95%置信区间:1.89,3.80)、参保时长(AOR=1.51;95%置信区间:1.19,1.92)、团结价值(AOR=1.71;95%置信区间:1.20,2.45)、感知风险保护(AOR=3.35;95%置信区间:2.27,4.96)和感知医疗质量(AOR=1.78;95%置信区间:1.34,2.37)是对该计划诚信度信任的正向预测因素,而财富指数(AOR=0.33;95%置信区间:0.23,0.47)和住院史(AOR=0.62;95%置信区间:0.48,0.82)是信任的负向预测因素。
对该计划诚信度的信任得分中等,一些信任维度评级较低,表明在建立信任时需要考虑的特定重点领域。计划管理者和卫生当局需要制定策略,以提高人们对医疗保险基本原则的理解,并在尽量减少就医费用的同时促进获得高质量医疗服务。