Torres Crg, Mailart M C, Ávila Dms, Barbosa Arcm, Pinatti Rfa, Lopes S R, Santos Tma, Moecke S E, Di Nicoló R, Borges A B
*Carlos Rocha Gomes Torres, DDS, PhD, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Institute of Science and Technology-UNESP, São Paulo State University, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mariane Cintra Mailart, DDS, MS, PhD, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Institute of Science and Technology-UNESP, São Paulo State University, São Paulo, Brazil.
Oper Dent. 2025 Mar 1;50(2):144-156. doi: 10.2341/24-066-C.
This study evaluated the influence of two types of glass ionomer-based luting agent on the clinical performance of metal-free zirconia crowns.
Thirty participants received two full crown restorations in either anterior or posterior teeth, in a split-mouth design. After tooth preparation, impressions with addition-cured silicone were made and casts were obtained. The casts were scanned and 3Y-TZP zirconia copings (Ceramill ZI - Amann Girrbach) were milled using a CAD/CAM system. Glass ceramic (IPS E.max Ceram, Ivoclar Vivadent) was used to create the crown shape. For each participant, one crown was cemented using a conventional glass ionomer (GIC - Meron, Voco), while the other received a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC - Meron Plus QM, Voco). The restorations were evaluated by two calibrated examiners after seven days, one year, and two years. The parameters at each evaluated time were analyzed by the Fisher exact test (α=0.05).
At two years postoperatively, 24 participants attended the recall, and 46 (76.67%) restorations were evaluated. No fractures or secondary caries were diagnosed. Minimal marginal staining was verified in both cements. During the follow-up period, only two anterior crowns cemented with conventional glass ionomer showed loss of retention. No loss of retention was detected in posterior crowns.
After two years of intraoral service, the crowns cemented with either conventional glass ionomer cement or resin-modified glass ionomer presented acceptable and similar clinical performance for all parameters analyzed in both anterior and posterior teeth.
本研究评估了两种玻璃离子基粘接剂对无金属氧化锆全冠临床性能的影响。
30名参与者采用分口设计,在前牙或后牙接受了两个全冠修复体。牙体预备后,用加成型硅橡胶制取印模并获得模型。对模型进行扫描,使用CAD/CAM系统铣削3Y-TZP氧化锆基底冠(Ceramill ZI - Amann Girrbach)。使用玻璃陶瓷(IPS E.max Ceram,义获嘉伟瓦登特)制作全冠外形。对于每位参与者,一个全冠用传统玻璃离子水门汀(GIC - Meron,VOCO)粘接,另一个用树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RMGIC - Meron Plus QM,VOCO)粘接。由两名经过校准培训的检查人员在7天、1年和2年后对修复体进行评估。每个评估时间点的参数采用Fisher精确检验进行分析(α=0.05)。
术后两年,24名参与者接受了复查,共评估了46个(76.67%)修复体。未诊断出骨折或继发龋。两种水门汀均观察到轻微的边缘染色。在随访期间,仅两个用传统玻璃离子水门汀粘接的前牙全冠出现固位丧失。后牙全冠未检测到固位丧失。
经过两年的口腔内使用,用传统玻璃离子水门汀或树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀粘接的全冠在前牙和后牙的所有分析参数方面均表现出可接受且相似的临床性能。