Bozzi Fabio, Conca Elena, Silvestri Marco, Dagrada Gianpaolo, Ardore Alice, Penso Donata, Lorenzini Daniele, Volpi Chiara Costanza, Trupia Desirè Viola, Busico Adele, Capone Iolanda, Perrone Federica, Tamborini Elena, Vingiani Andrea, Agnelli Luca, Pruneri Giancarlo
Department of Diagnostic Innovation, Pathology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, 20133, Italy.
Department of Research, Nutrition and Metabolomics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, 20133, Italy.
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 5;15(1):4314. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88494-3.
Copy number alterations (CNAs) play a fundamental role in cancer development and constitute a potential tool for tailored treatments. The CNAs recognition in formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) material for diagnostic purposes has relied for years mainly on fluorescence in situ hybridization. The introduction of other procedures, such as Next-Generation Sequencing has dramatically improved CNAs discovery at genome-wide level. The detection of CNAs by NGS in FFPE material is, nonetheless, a complex issue, which still requires validation studies. Herein, the CNAs detection by a widely used NGS assay (Oncomine Comprehensive Assay plus, OCA+) were evaluated in 14 FFPE samples mirroring diagnostic daily practice and compared to a whole-genome assay. OCA+, a targeted DNA panel, showed lower CNAs detection sensitivity and equal specificity for gains and losses. According to proprietary software pipeline, OCA+ accurately identified gains characterized by CN ≥ 5,2. No significant threshold maximizing the difference between true and false positive losses was found. Orthogonal FISH tests validated seven CNAs characterized by CN gain ≥ 6 or complete loss. Considering the CNAs growing significance in precision medicine, our findings further prompt towards a robust validation of NGS detection in FFPE materials.
拷贝数改变(CNAs)在癌症发展中起着重要作用,并构成了定制治疗的潜在工具。多年来,出于诊断目的,在福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)材料中识别CNAs主要依赖于荧光原位杂交。其他方法的引入,如下一代测序,极大地改善了全基因组水平上CNAs的发现。然而,通过NGS在FFPE材料中检测CNAs是一个复杂的问题,仍然需要进行验证研究。在此,我们在14个反映日常诊断实践的FFPE样本中评估了一种广泛使用的NGS检测方法(Oncomine Comprehensive Assay plus,OCA+)对CNAs的检测,并与全基因组检测方法进行了比较。OCA+是一种靶向DNA面板,其对CNAs的检测灵敏度较低,对扩增和缺失的特异性相同。根据专有软件流程,OCA+能够准确识别CN≥5.2的扩增。未发现能最大程度区分真阳性和假阳性缺失的显著阈值。正交FISH检测验证了7个CN≥6或完全缺失的CNAs。鉴于CNAs在精准医学中的重要性日益增加,我们的研究结果进一步促使人们对FFPE材料中NGS检测进行强有力的验证。