Rout J, Essack S, Brysiewicz P
School of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Antimicrobial Research Unit, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
South Afr J Crit Care. 2024 Nov 25;40(3):e1539. doi: 10.7196/SAJCC.2024.v40i3.1539. eCollection 2024.
Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) has become integral to healthcare. In the case of antimicrobial medicines, nurses are responsible for preparing medication, and ensuring its correct and safe administration.
To describe intensive care nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practices of intravenous antimicrobial infusion administration in the context of access to AMS teaching.
Convenience sampling was conducted of all 161 bedside nurses working in three general intensive care units. The nursing unit manager from each unit was requested to provide information detailing unit demographics and AMS activity within the unit (e.g. existence of AMS; nurse inclusion on the AMS team; frequency of AMS rounds; availability of AMS policies, protocols or guidelines; and training on the administration of intravenous antimicrobial medicines).
Intensive care nursing management reported cessation of AMS programmes in all three units during COVID-19, with minimal activity in one intensive care unit even before the onset of the pandemic. Responses from bedside nurses emphasised the unavailability of in-service AMS teaching in the units (46.4%). Questions on antibiotic groups scored poorly (55.7%). Respondents (63.8%) indicated that the hospital intravenous antibiotic policy was useful but 21.7% reported that they had never seen this policy in their unit. Opportunities for training on intravenous administration of antimicrobial medications were provided on induction to the hospital (14.5%), or in-service (30.4%) by the clinical facilitators (34.8%), or by doctors (24.6%). Fifty-one percent of respondents reported administering antibiotics through a dedicated antibiotic infusion line. Forty-five percent of respondents used a non-dedicated line, and 56.5% of respondents flushed the line between doses.
Results suggest inadequate training. This, coupled with the evident poor access to policies and protocols, may adversely affect nurse knowledge of principles to prevent antimicrobial resistance.
This study highlights that a lack of antimicrobial stewardship guidance to bedside nurses persists; that nurses do not always have access to in-service training and policies, protocols, and guidelines; and that flushing the IV administration line following the administration of an intermittent antimicrobial infusion, should be viewed as best practice to ensure the complete delivery of the dose.
抗菌药物管理(AMS)已成为医疗保健不可或缺的一部分。就抗菌药物而言,护士负责准备药物,并确保其正确、安全给药。
描述在获得AMS教学的背景下,重症监护护士在静脉输注抗菌药物方面的知识、态度和实践。
对在三个普通重症监护病房工作的所有161名床边护士进行便利抽样。要求每个病房的护理单元经理提供详细信息,包括单元人口统计学和单元内的AMS活动(例如,AMS的存在情况;护士是否加入AMS团队;AMS查房的频率;AMS政策、规程或指南的可用性;以及静脉输注抗菌药物管理方面的培训)。
重症监护护理管理层报告称,在新冠疫情期间,所有三个病房的AMS项目都已停止,甚至在疫情爆发前,一个重症监护病房的活动就很少。床边护士的回答强调各病房缺乏在职AMS教学(46.4%)。关于抗生素类别的问题得分很低(55.7%)。受访者(63.8%)表示医院的静脉抗生素政策很有用,但21.7%的受访者报告称他们在自己的病房从未见过该政策。在入职医院时(14.5%)、或由临床协调员(34.8%)或医生(24.6%)提供在职培训(30.4%)时,提供了静脉输注抗菌药物管理方面的培训机会。51%的受访者报告通过专用抗生素输注管路给药。45%的受访者使用非专用管路,56.5%的受访者在不同剂量之间冲洗管路。
结果表明培训不足。这一点,再加上明显难以获取政策和规程,可能会对护士预防抗菌药物耐药性的原则知识产生不利影响。
本研究强调,床边护士仍然缺乏抗菌药物管理指导;护士并非总能获得在职培训以及政策、规程和指南;并且在间歇性输注抗菌药物后冲洗静脉给药管路,应被视为确保药物剂量完全输注的最佳做法。