Falcon Bruna Thaytala Quintino, de Mello Guimaraes Tamires, Halpern Gabriele Alves, Gomes Cintia, de Mello Guimaraes Taisa
Department of Medicine, Federal Fluminense University (UFF), Niteroi, RJ, Brazil.
Department of Medicine, University of Volta Redonda, Volta Redonda, RJ, Brazil.
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr;44(2):154-162. doi: 10.1007/s12664-024-01720-0. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with upadacitinib and examined secondary adverse events.
A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing upadacitinib with placebo in adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The primary outcome was the incidence of SAEs, while secondary outcomes included specific adverse events. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.
Six RCTs, including 2611 patients, were analyzed. The incidence of SAEs did not significantly differ between upadacitinib (6.1%) and placebo (7%) (RR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.50-1.20; p = 0.25). Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences in serious infections, hepatic disorders, nasopharyngitis or herpes zoster. However, neutropenia (RR = 5.63; 95% CI: 1.90-16.65; p = 0.0002) and creatine kinase elevation (RR = 2.34; 95% CI: 1.22-4.47; p = 0.01) were higher with upadacitinib, while anemia (RR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.27-0.48; p < 0.00001) and arthralgia (RR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.30-0.75; p = 0.001) were reduced.
Upadacitinib did not increase the overall risk of SAEs in IBD patients, with a notable reduction in anemia and arthralgia. However, the higher risks of neutropenia and CK elevation underscore the importance of monitoring. Further research is necessary to assess long-term safety, particularly regarding rare but serious events such as thromboembolism.
本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了接受乌帕替尼治疗的克罗恩病(CD)和溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者严重不良事件(SAE)的发生率,并研究了次要不良事件。
全面检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,以确定在成人炎症性肠病(IBD)中比较乌帕替尼与安慰剂的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局是SAE的发生率,次要结局包括特定不良事件。计算了具有95%置信区间(CI)的风险比(RR)。
分析了6项RCT,共2611例患者。乌帕替尼组(6.1%)和安慰剂组(7%)的SAE发生率无显著差异(RR = 0.77;95% CI:0.50 - 1.20;p = 0.25)。次要结局显示,在严重感染、肝脏疾病、鼻咽炎或带状疱疹方面无显著差异。然而,乌帕替尼组的中性粒细胞减少症(RR = 5.63;95% CI:1.90 - 16.65;p = 0.0002)和肌酸激酶升高(RR = 2.34;95% CI:1.22 - 4.47;p = 0.01)较高,而贫血(RR = 0.36;95% CI:0.27 - 0.48;p < 0.00001)和关节痛(RR = 0.47;95% CI:0.30 - 0.75;p = 0.001)有所减少。
乌帕替尼未增加IBD患者SAE的总体风险,贫血和关节痛显著减少。然而,中性粒细胞减少症和CK升高的较高风险凸显了监测的重要性。有必要进一步研究以评估长期安全性,特别是关于血栓栓塞等罕见但严重的事件。