Giovannini Elena, Bianchini Simone, Roccaro Mariana, Pelletti Guido, Grandis Annamaria, Peli Angelo, Lenzi Jacopo, Pelotti Susi, Fais Paolo
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Unit of Legal Medicine, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 49, Bologna 40126, Italy.
Department for Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna, Corso D'Augusto, 237, Rimini 47921, Italy.
Forensic Sci Int. 2025 Mar;368:112392. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112392. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
Dog attacks on humans represent a global issue with significant health and medico-legal implications. A dog attack may cut or puncture a victim's skin resulting in distinctive lesions representing the morphology of the dentition that created it. Analysing the compatibility of dog bite marks is exceedingly intricate due to numerous variables involved in wound dynamics. The primary parameter under evaluation is the inter-canine distance, representing the space between two canine teeth within the same dental arch. However, a limitation arises when suspected dogs have similar skull sizes, particularly among adults of the same breed and no studies have been identified that experimentally analyze bite marks on human tissues. The aim of this experimental study is to conduct a morphometric comparison between the dental measurements of canine teeth from 20 different dogs and the skin lesions produced on human tissue. Two metric parameters were assessed: "inter-canine distance" and "interdental incisor-canine distance". The inter-canine measurements ranged between 21 and 52 mm, and 20-53 mm on skin. The incisor-to-canine measures ranged between 5 and 21 mm, and 4-21 mm on skin. The degree of agreement for all inter-canine measurements is high, regardless of the type of arch or skull (superior-inferior or mesocephalic-dolichocephalic-brachycephalic). Conversely, the agreement for incisor-to-canine measurements is high in measurements obtained from the lower arches and brachycephalic skulls. Considering the promising results shown by the morphological and morphometric analysis reported in the study, a multidisciplinary approach, fostering collaboration between forensic experts in pathology, dentistry, anthropology, DNA and veterinary medicine, is essential for a comprehensive evaluation of bite marks.
犬类对人类的攻击是一个全球性问题,具有重大的健康和法医学意义。犬类攻击可能会割破或刺穿受害者的皮肤,导致出现独特的损伤,这些损伤呈现出造成该损伤的牙列形态。由于伤口形成过程中涉及众多变量,分析犬咬痕的匹配度极为复杂。评估的主要参数是犬齿间距,即同一牙弓内两颗犬齿之间的距离。然而,当怀疑的犬类头骨大小相似时,尤其是同一品种的成年犬,就会出现局限性,而且尚未发现有研究对人体组织上的咬痕进行实验分析。本实验研究的目的是对20只不同犬类的犬齿牙齿测量数据与人体组织上产生的皮肤损伤进行形态测量比较。评估了两个度量参数:“犬齿间距”和“门齿-犬齿间距”。犬齿间距的测量范围在21至52毫米之间,在皮肤上的测量范围为20至53毫米。门齿到犬齿的测量范围在5至21毫米之间,在皮肤上的测量范围为4至21毫米。无论牙弓或头骨类型(上下颌或中头型-长头型-短头型)如何,所有犬齿间距测量的一致性程度都很高。相反,从下颌牙弓和短头型头骨获得的门齿到犬齿测量的一致性很高。考虑到该研究报告的形态学和形态测量分析显示出的有前景的结果,一种多学科方法,促进病理学、牙科、人类学、DNA和兽医学方面的法医专家之间的合作,对于全面评估咬痕至关重要。