Sener Seher, Batu Ezgi Deniz
Adana City Research and Training Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Adana, Turkey.
Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Ankara, Turkey.
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2025 Apr;71:152634. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152634. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
Biologic drugs are a potential treatment option in resistant cases of juvenile scleroderma. In this review, we aimed to examine previous studies regarding biologic drug use in pediatric patients with localized scleroderma and systemic sclerosis.
We performed a search on MEDLINE and Scopus for articles involving pediatric localized scleroderma and systemic sclerosis patients treated with biologic drugs.
We identified 17 articles describing 58 pediatric patients with localized scleroderma treated with biologic drugs and 12 articles describing 29 pediatric patients with systemic sclerosis treated with biologic drugs during our literature search. The most frequently used biologic drug in localized scleroderma treatment was abatacept (55.2 %), followed by tocilizumab (48.3 %). These biologic drugs were mainly preferred for treating resistant/progressive skin disease in pediatric patients with localized scleroderma (58.5 % and 68.8 %, respectively). The improvement rates associated with abatacept and tocilizumab were 92.9 % and 77.4 %, respectively. Adverse events were observed in 23.5 % of all localized scleroderma patients. The most frequently used biologic drug in systemic sclerosis treatment was rituximab (51.7 %), followed by tocilizumab (44.8 %). Rituximab was predominantly favored for managing cardiac involvement (45.5 %), whereas tocilizumab was preferred for pulmonary involvement (50 %) in pediatric patients with systemic sclerosis. The improvement rates associated with rituximab and tocilizumab were 72.7 % and 94.1 %, respectively. Adverse events were reported in 40 % of all systemic sclerosis patients.
Our results showed that abatacept and tocilizumab were more frequently used in patients with localized scleroderma, while rituximab and tocilizumab were the predominantly used biologics in patients with systemic sclerosis. The improvement rate with these biologics were quite high with acceptable safety profile.
生物药物是青少年硬皮病耐药病例的一种潜在治疗选择。在本综述中,我们旨在研究既往关于生物药物用于儿童局限性硬皮病和系统性硬化症患者的研究。
我们在MEDLINE和Scopus上搜索了涉及接受生物药物治疗的儿童局限性硬皮病和系统性硬化症患者的文章。
在我们的文献检索中,我们确定了17篇描述58例接受生物药物治疗的儿童局限性硬皮病患者的文章,以及12篇描述29例接受生物药物治疗的儿童系统性硬化症患者的文章。局限性硬皮病治疗中最常用的生物药物是阿巴西普(55.2%),其次是托珠单抗(48.3%)。这些生物药物主要用于治疗儿童局限性硬皮病患者的耐药/进行性皮肤病(分别为58.5%和68.8%)。与阿巴西普和托珠单抗相关的改善率分别为92.9%和77.4%。所有局限性硬皮病患者中有23.5%观察到不良事件。系统性硬化症治疗中最常用的生物药物是利妥昔单抗(51.7%),其次是托珠单抗(44.8%)。在儿童系统性硬化症患者中,利妥昔单抗主要用于治疗心脏受累(45.5%),而托珠单抗则更常用于治疗肺部受累(50%)。与利妥昔单抗和托珠单抗相关的改善率分别为72.7%和94.1%。所有系统性硬化症患者中有40%报告了不良事件。
我们的结果表明,阿巴西普和托珠单抗在局限性硬皮病患者中使用更为频繁,而利妥昔单抗和托珠单抗是系统性硬化症患者中主要使用的生物制剂。这些生物制剂的改善率相当高,安全性也可接受。