Khandan Mohammad, Montazeri Ali, Ebrahimi Ali
Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, School of Public Health, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Kara Amar Samin, Qom, Iran.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 12;25(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12369-6.
Work organization significantly impacts occupational incidents and fatigue in hospital settings, particularly among nurses. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of instruments measuring work organization and fatigue and to examine their relationship with occupational accidents.
A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2019 with 200 nurses working in hospitals in Qom, Iran using the stratified sampling method. Data were collected using three standardized tools: the Work Organization Questionnaire, the Fatigue Checklist, and a demographic information questionnaire. Structural equation modeling was employed to analyze the data, while instrument validity and reliability were assessed through Cronbach's alpha, composite reliability, and average variance extracted (AVE). Analysis was performed using Smart PLS and SPSS V20.
The analysis revealed a significant relationship between work organization and occupational accidents (t = 3.22, p < 0.05). However, the relationships between work organization and fatigue (t = 0.03) and between fatigue and occupational accidents (t = 1.49) were not statistically significant. The Work Organization Questionnaire (WOAQ) demonstrated robust validity and reliability, making it suitable for assessing occupational risks in hospital environments. In contrast, the Fatigue Questionnaire (CIS) exhibited acceptable validity but insufficient reliability (Cronbach's alpha < 0.7), highlighting the need for further refinement.
This study revealed that the Work Organization Questionnaire has acceptable validity and reliability, making it suitable for hospital settings, while the Fatigue Questionnaire requires further revision. It is recommended that hospital administrators optimize work schedules and provide fatigue management training, and policymakers utilize validated tools to reduce occupational risks and enhance workplace safety.
工作组织对医院环境中的职业事故和疲劳有重大影响,尤其是对护士而言。本研究旨在评估测量工作组织和疲劳的工具的心理测量特性,并检验它们与职业事故的关系。
2019年采用分层抽样法对伊朗库姆市医院的200名护士进行了一项横断面研究。使用三种标准化工具收集数据:工作组织问卷、疲劳检查表和人口统计学信息问卷。采用结构方程模型分析数据,同时通过克朗巴哈系数、组合信度和提取的平均方差(AVE)评估工具的效度和信度。使用Smart PLS和SPSS V20进行分析。
分析显示工作组织与职业事故之间存在显著关系(t = 3.22,p < 0.05)。然而,工作组织与疲劳之间的关系(t = 0.03)以及疲劳与职业事故之间的关系(t = 1.49)在统计学上并不显著。工作组织问卷(WOAQ)显示出强大的效度和信度,适用于评估医院环境中的职业风险。相比之下,疲劳问卷(CIS)显示出可接受的效度,但信度不足(克朗巴哈系数<0.7),这突出了进一步完善的必要性。
本研究表明,工作组织问卷具有可接受的效度和信度,适用于医院环境,而疲劳问卷需要进一步修订。建议医院管理人员优化工作时间表并提供疲劳管理培训,政策制定者使用经过验证的工具来降低职业风险并提高工作场所安全性。