Auf der Maur Eric, Kueffer Thomas, Thalmann Gregor, Kozhuharov Nikola A, Galuszka Oskar, Iqbal Salik Ur Rehman, Madaffari Antonio, Servatius Helge, Haeberlin Andreas, Noti Fabian, Tanner Hildegard, Roten Laurent, Reichlin Tobias
Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 22;14(3):701. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030701.
: Radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) is a recommended treatment option for typical atrial flutter (AFL). While power-controlled ablation has been the current standard, a novel temperature-controlled ablation system has been introduced. We aimed to compare the procedural efficacy and one-year outcome of a temperature-controlled diamond-tip catheter with an established power-controlled gold-tip catheter. : Consecutive patients undergoing ablation of CTI-dependent AFL using a power-controlled catheter or the novel temperature-controlled catheter were enrolled. Patients were followed up using a 7-day electrocardiogram after 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary endpoint was acute efficacy (procedural success, total RF, and procedure time). The secondary endpoint was the recurrence of typical AFL during follow-up. : In total, 38 patients undergoing temperature-controlled ablation were enrolled and compared to 283 patients undergoing power-controlled ablation. A bidirectional CTI block was achieved in 100% in the temperature-controlled group and 97.5% in the power-controlled group ( = 0.7). The total RF time (median: 192 sec (IQR 138-311) vs. 643 sec (IQR 386-1079), < 0.001) and total procedure time (median: 45 min (IQR 34-57) vs. 52 min (IQR 39-70), = 0.01) were shorter with temperature-controlled ablation. At the one-year follow-up, there was no difference in the recurrence of typical AFL between groups. : Utilization of temperature-controlled ablation for typical AFL increased procedural efficiency with shorter RF and procedure times compared to power-controlled ablation. The recurrence rate of typical AFL after one year was low and did not differ amongst groups.
射频(RF)消融三尖瓣峡部(CTI)是典型心房扑动(AFL)的推荐治疗选择。虽然功率控制消融一直是当前的标准方法,但一种新型的温度控制消融系统已被引入。我们旨在比较温度控制的菱形尖端导管与既定的功率控制金尖端导管的手术疗效和一年结局。
连续入选使用功率控制导管或新型温度控制导管进行CTI依赖性AFL消融的患者。在3、6和12个月后使用7天心电图对患者进行随访。主要终点是急性疗效(手术成功、总射频时间和手术时间)。次要终点是随访期间典型AFL的复发。
总共38例接受温度控制消融的患者入选,并与283例接受功率控制消融的患者进行比较。温度控制组100%实现双向CTI阻滞,功率控制组为97.5%(P = 0.7)。温度控制消融的总射频时间(中位数:192秒(四分位间距138 - 311)对643秒(四分位间距386 - 1079),P < 0.001)和总手术时间(中位数:45分钟(四分位间距34 - 57)对52分钟(四分位间距39 - 70),P = 同组患者的典型AFL复发率无差异。
与功率控制消融相比,使用温度控制消融治疗典型AFL可提高手术效率,缩短射频时间和手术时间。一年后典型AFL的复发率较低,且组间无差异。 0.01)更短。在一年的随访中,各