Suppr超能文献

社会心理因素与头晕患者的社区活动能力及参与度相关。

Psychosocial factors are associated with community mobility and participation in persons with dizziness.

作者信息

Dunlap Pamela M, Staab Jeffrey P, Sparto Patrick J, Furman Joseph M, Whitney Susan L

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2025 Jan 29;16:1531204. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1531204. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Among individuals with dizziness, there is an increased prevalence of psychosocial comorbidity compared to the general population. Increased psychosocial comorbidity among people with dizziness is associated with disability and poorer outcomes in vestibular rehabilitation. However, there is less knowledge regarding the association between psychosocial factors and mobility outcomes in people with dizziness. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the association between psychosocial factors and future activity, participation, and community mobility among people with dizziness. The secondary aim of this study was to explore the constructs measured using patient-reported outcomes associated with psychosocial factors in this population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study with an in-person baseline assessment and a follow-up assessment completed at 3-months via computerized questionnaires. We measured psychosocial factors at baseline using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Patient Health Questionnaire 4-item (PHQ-4), the Vestibular Activities Avoidance Instrument (VAAI), and the Dizziness Catastrophizing Scale (DCS). We measured community mobility and participation at baseline and 3-month follow-up using the Life Space Assessment (LSA) and Vestibular Activities and Participation Measure (VAP). To determine the associations between baseline anxiety and depression symptoms, fear avoidance, catastrophizing beliefs and mobility and disability measures, we used simple linear regression and repeated measures ANOVA. We used exploratory factor analysis to identify constructs measured using patient-reported outcomes of psychosocial factors.

RESULTS

There were 100 participants who completed the baseline assessment [mean age (SD) = 49.2 (15.7) years; 73% female] and 68 participants completed the questionnaire at the 3-month follow-up. In bivariate analyses, baseline VAAI, HADS-A, HADS-D, PHQ-4 depression, and VAP were associated with LSA, and baseline VAAI, HADS-D, PHQ-4 depression, and LSA were associated with VAP at 3-month follow-up (all  < 0.05). In adjusted multivariate analyses, baseline VAP had a large effect ( = 11.65,  = 0.001,  = 0.18) and HADS-D had a moderately large effect ( = 4.09,  = 0.048,  = 0.07) on LSA score at 3-month follow-up. Baseline VAAI had a large effect ( = 23.35,  < 0.001,  = 0.3) on VAP at 3-month follow-up. The exploratory factor analysis of the VAAI, HADS, PHQ-4, and DCS resulted in 4 factors measuring constructs of fear avoidance, anxiety, depression, and catastrophization.

DISCUSSION

We found that baseline psychosocial factors were related to future measures of activity and participation as well as community mobility in people with dizziness. Specifically, baseline activity and participation levels and depressive symptoms were significantly associated with future community mobility and baseline fear avoidance beliefs were significantly associated with future activity and participation. Patient-reported outcome measures of psychosocial factors appear to measure unique constructs, which may indicate that a small number of different outcome measures may be needed to gather important prognostic information to manage individuals with dizziness well.

摘要

引言

与普通人群相比,头晕患者中社会心理合并症的患病率更高。头晕患者中社会心理合并症增加与残疾以及前庭康复效果较差有关。然而,关于头晕患者社会心理因素与活动能力结果之间的关联,人们了解较少。因此,本研究的目的是评估头晕患者社会心理因素与未来活动、参与及社区活动能力之间的关联。本研究的次要目的是探索使用患者报告结局所测量的、与该人群社会心理因素相关的结构。

材料与方法

我们开展了一项前瞻性队列研究,进行了一次面对面的基线评估,并在3个月时通过计算机化问卷完成了随访评估。我们在基线时使用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)、患者健康问卷4项版(PHQ - 4)、前庭活动回避量表(VAAI)和头晕灾难化量表(DCS)测量社会心理因素。我们在基线和3个月随访时使用生活空间评估(LSA)和前庭活动与参与测量(VAP)来测量社区活动能力和参与情况。为了确定基线焦虑和抑郁症状、恐惧回避、灾难化信念与活动能力及残疾测量之间的关联,我们使用了简单线性回归和重复测量方差分析。我们使用探索性因素分析来识别使用患者报告的社会心理因素结局所测量的结构。

结果

有100名参与者完成了基线评估[平均年龄(标准差)= 49.2(15.7)岁;73%为女性],68名参与者在3个月随访时完成了问卷。在双变量分析中,基线VAAI、HADS - A、HADS - D、PHQ - 4抑郁得分以及VAP与LSA相关,基线VAAI、HADS - D、PHQ - 4抑郁得分以及LSA与3个月随访时的VAP相关(均P < 0.05)。在调整后的多变量分析中,基线VAP对3个月随访时的LSA得分有较大影响(β = 11.65,P = 0.001,R² = 0.18),HADS - D有中等程度的较大影响(β = 4.09,P = 0.048,R² = 0.07)。基线VAAI对3个月随访时的VAP有较大影响(β = 23.35,P < 0.001,R² = 0.3)。对VAAI、HADS、PHQ - 4和DCS进行探索性因素分析,得到了4个测量恐惧回避、焦虑、抑郁和灾难化结构的因素。

讨论

我们发现基线社会心理因素与头晕患者未来的活动、参与及社区活动能力测量相关。具体而言,基线活动和参与水平以及抑郁症状与未来社区活动能力显著相关,基线恐惧回避信念与未来活动和参与显著相关。患者报告的社会心理因素结局测量似乎测量了独特的结构,这可能表明可能需要少量不同的结局测量来收集重要的预后信息,以便更好地管理头晕患者。

相似文献

3
Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Vestibular Activities Avoidance Instrument.前庭活动回避量表的探索性因子分析。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Feb 1;147(2):144-150. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.4203.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验