Zhang Wengang, Zhao Wencheng, Zhang Xinyu, Guo Zhiyi, Ye Li, Chen Zhimin, Xu Kandi, Zhao Lishu, Liu Xinyue, Liu Yujin, Wang Hao, He Yayi
Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025 Jan 24;14(1):163-175. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-24-636. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
Combination regimens of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy have been approved as the first-line and standard of care for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Novel regimens are continuously being explored, with the ETER701 study being the representative randomized controlled trial (RCT). ETER701 study has assessed the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy with or without anlotinib (multi-target angiogenesis inhibitor) + benmelstobart (programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitor) (Anl/Ben/CT). There is no evidence-based medicine available proving that Anl/Ben/CT is the optimal regimen due to the lack of direct or indirect comparisons among varying immunotherapy-based regimens. In this study, we aimed to identify the optimal regimen to assist in clinical decision-making.
The eligible RCTs were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and major international conferences. Then, the network meta-analysis was analyzed to compare the efficacy and safety among 15 first-line regimens in ES-SCLC. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the risk of bias in included studies.
A total of 12 immunotherapy-related RCTs covering 15 interventions and 6,178 patients with ES-SCLC were included. Overall, most RCTs exhibited a low risk of bias across multiple domains. The results indicated that most immunotherapy-based regimens could significantly prolong progression-free survival (PFS) compared with chemotherapy alone, especially Anl/Ben/CT [hazard ratio (HR) 0.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25-0.40]. Similar results were observed regarding overall survival (OS), that is, most immunotherapy-related regimens dramatically reduced the risk of death in ES-SCLC, with Anl/Ben/CT being the most prominent (HR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.47-0.80). The Bayesian ranking probabilities showed that Anl/Ben/CT ranked first and serplulimab plus chemotherapy ranked second in both PFS and OS among 15 regimens. Regarding safety, Anl/Ben/CT ranked 3rd, and serplulimab plus chemotherapy ranked 7th.
Adding anlotinib and benmelstobart to chemotherapy significantly improved PFS and OS compared with chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus immunotherapy, with an acceptable safety profile in patients with ES-SCLC. In conclusion, Anl/Ben/CT could be a new, preferable first-line treatment option but further clinical studies are needed to validate its efficacy and safety.
免疫疗法联合化疗方案已被批准作为广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)的一线标准治疗方案。新型方案不断被探索,ETER701研究是具有代表性的随机对照试验(RCT)。ETER701研究评估了化疗联合或不联合安罗替尼(多靶点血管生成抑制剂)+苯美司他巴特(程序性细胞死亡配体1抑制剂)(Anl/Ben/CT)的疗效和安全性。由于缺乏基于不同免疫疗法方案之间的直接或间接比较,尚无循证医学证据证明Anl/Ben/CT是最佳方案。在本研究中,我们旨在确定最佳方案以辅助临床决策。
通过检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆数据库和主要国际会议来识别符合条件的RCT。然后,进行网络荟萃分析以比较ES-SCLC的15种一线方案的疗效和安全性。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估纳入研究中的偏倚风险。
共纳入12项与免疫疗法相关的RCT,涵盖15种干预措施和6178例ES-SCLC患者。总体而言,大多数RCT在多个领域的偏倚风险较低。结果表明,与单纯化疗相比,大多数基于免疫疗法的方案可显著延长无进展生存期(PFS),尤其是Anl/Ben/CT[风险比(HR)0.32,95%置信区间(CI):0.25-0.40]。总生存期(OS)方面也观察到类似结果,即大多数与免疫疗法相关的方案显著降低了ES-SCLC的死亡风险,Anl/Ben/CT最为突出(HR 0.61,95%CI:0.47-0.80)。贝叶斯排序概率显示,在15种方案中,Anl/Ben/CT在PFS和OS方面均排名第一,斯鲁利单抗联合化疗排名第二。在安全性方面,Anl/Ben/CT排名第三,斯鲁利单抗联合化疗排名第七。
与单纯化疗或化疗联合免疫疗法相比,化疗联合安罗替尼和苯美司他巴特可显著改善ES-SCLC患者的PFS和OS,且安全性可接受。总之,Anl/Ben/CT可能是一种新的、更优的一线治疗选择,但需要进一步的临床研究来验证其疗效和安全性。