Suppr超能文献

肺叶切除术加肺叶特异性淋巴结清扫术作为高代谢临床ⅠA期非小细胞肺癌根治性切除的最低标准。

Lobectomy plus lobe-specific lymphadenectomy as the minimum standards of curative resection for hypermetabolic clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer.

作者信息

Li Runze, Li Zhifei, Li Peng, Chen Jianchuan, Qiu Bin, Tan Fengwei, Xue Qi, Gao Shugeng, He Jie

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Zibo First Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Zibo, China.

出版信息

Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025 Jan 24;14(1):14-26. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-24-804. Epub 2025 Jan 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The results of three modern randomized controlled trials have proved sublobar resection as an effective procedure for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) up to 2 cm. We aimed to examine whether sublobar resection is oncologically feasible and what constitutes adequate lymph node assessment for hypermetabolic clinical stage IA (cIA) NSCLC.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study was conducted in 589 patients who underwent lobectomy (n=526) or sublobar resection (n=63) for hypermetabolic cIA NSCLC [maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) ≥2.6 g/dL]. The primary outcomes (lung cancer-specific death and tumor recurrence) were compared in a competing risks framework for all patients and the propensity score matched pairs. Random forests were used to examine the variable importance for lung cancer-specific survival and tumor recurrence. Factors affecting pathological upstaging and recurrence-free survival were assessed by logistic regression analysis and Cox regression analysis, respectively.

RESULTS

Sublobar resection had significantly higher lung cancer-specific cumulative incidence of death (LC-CID) and cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR) than lobectomy after matching (5-year LC-CID, 20.8% . 6.5%, P<0.001; 5-year CIR, 37.9% . 14.8%, P<0.001). Wedge resection was an independent risk factor for both lung-cancer specific death [hazard ratio (HR) =4.17; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.07-8.36; P<0.001] and recurrence (HR =3.48; 95% CI: 1.91-6.33; P<0.001). Lymphadenectomy that failed to meet the lobe-specific nodal dissection (LSND) criteria correlated with decreased odds of pathological nodal upstaging [odds ratio (OR) =0.55; 95% CI: 0.34-0.87; P=0.01]. While patients with LSND had lower LC-CIR and CIR, there was no additional prognostic benefit of systemic nodal dissection (SND) over LSND.

CONCLUSIONS

Lobectomy was oncologically superior to sublobar resection as a curative-intent procedure for hypermetabolic cIA NSCLC. Lobectomy plus lobe-specific lymphadenectomy should be considered as the minimum standards of curative resection for hypermetabolic early-stage NSCLC in order to achieve more accurate pathological N staging and better cancer control.

摘要

背景

三项现代随机对照试验的结果已证明,亚肺叶切除是治疗直径达2 cm的早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的有效方法。我们旨在探讨亚肺叶切除在肿瘤学上是否可行,以及对于代谢增高的临床IA期(cIA)NSCLC,何种程度的淋巴结评估才足够。

方法

对589例因代谢增高的cIA NSCLC(最大标准化摄取值[SUVmax]≥2.6 g/dL)接受肺叶切除术(n = 526)或亚肺叶切除术(n = 63)的患者进行了一项单中心回顾性研究。在竞争风险框架下,对所有患者以及倾向评分匹配对的主要结局(肺癌特异性死亡和肿瘤复发)进行了比较。使用随机森林来检验肺癌特异性生存和肿瘤复发的变量重要性。分别通过逻辑回归分析和Cox回归分析评估影响病理分期升级和无复发生存的因素。

结果

匹配后,亚肺叶切除的肺癌特异性累积死亡发生率(LC-CID)和累积复发发生率(CIR)显著高于肺叶切除(5年LC-CID,20.8%对6.5%,P<0.001;5年CIR,37.9%对14.8%,P<0.001)。楔形切除是肺癌特异性死亡[风险比(HR)=4.17;95%置信区间(CI):2.07 - 8.36;P<0.001]和复发(HR =3.48;95%CI:1.91 - 6.33;P<0.001)的独立危险因素。未达到肺叶特异性淋巴结清扫(LSND)标准的淋巴结清扫与病理淋巴结分期升级几率降低相关[优势比(OR)=0.55;95%CI:0.34 - 0.87;P = 0.01]。虽然接受LSND的患者LC-CIR和CIR较低,但系统性淋巴结清扫(SND)相对于LSND并无额外的预后益处。

结论

作为一种针对代谢增高的cIA NSCLC的根治性手术,肺叶切除在肿瘤学上优于亚肺叶切除。肺叶切除加肺叶特异性淋巴结清扫应被视为代谢增高的早期NSCLC根治性切除的最低标准,以便实现更准确的病理N分期和更好的癌症控制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a868/11826270/e5b55da46311/tlcr-14-01-14-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验